Note invariance reason for FnDef types #95607
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
It would be nice to mention one of the function parameters in the error message, but we can work on improving this error over time. @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 2c4f845 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2022
…n1011 Note invariance reason for FnDef types Fixes rust-lang#95272. Is it worthwhile even printing a variance explanation here? Or should I try to track down which function parameter is responsible for the invariance? r? `@Aaron1011` since you wrote rust-lang#89336
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
issue-95272
branch
from
2c4f845
to
2a129d4
Compare
|
@bors r=Aaron1011 (blessed nll comparison mode) |
|
📌 Commit 2a129d4 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2022
…n1011 Note invariance reason for FnDef types Fixes rust-lang#95272. Is it worthwhile even printing a variance explanation here? Or should I try to track down which function parameter is responsible for the invariance? r? `@Aaron1011` since you wrote rust-lang#89336
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#95234 (bootstrap.py: nixos check in /etc/os-release with quotes) - rust-lang#95449 (Fix `x doc --stage 0 compiler`) - rust-lang#95512 (diagnostics: translation infrastructure) - rust-lang#95607 (Note invariance reason for FnDef types) - rust-lang#95645 (Fix intra doc link ICE when trying to get traits in scope for primitive) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #95272. Is it worthwhile even printing a variance explanation here? Or should I try to track down which function parameter is responsible for the invariance?
r? @Aaron1011 since you wrote #89336