Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add aliases for std::fs::canonicalize #96586

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2022
Merged

Add aliases for std::fs::canonicalize #96586

merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2022

Conversation

ear7h
Copy link
Contributor

@ear7h ear7h commented Apr 30, 2022

The aliases are realpath and GetFinalPathNameByHandle which are explicitly mentioned in canonicalize's documentation.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 30, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with r? rust-lang/libs-api @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to request review from a libs-api team reviewer. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @kennytm (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 30, 2022
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

I'm slightly more skeptical that someone would search for GetFinalPathNameByHandle in the Rust documentation than I am that someone would search for realpath.

But sure.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 7, 2022

📌 Commit 15386dc has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 7, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 7, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#96336 (Link to correct `as_mut` in docs for `pointer::as_ref`)
 - rust-lang#96586 (Add aliases for std::fs::canonicalize)
 - rust-lang#96667 (Add regression test)
 - rust-lang#96671 (Remove hard links from `env::current_exe` security example)
 - rust-lang#96726 (Add regression and bug tests)
 - rust-lang#96756 (Enable compiler-docs by default for `compiler`, `codegen`, and `tools` profiles)
 - rust-lang#96757 (Don't constantly rebuild clippy on `x test src/tools/clippy`.)
 - rust-lang#96769 (Remove `adx_target_feature` feature from active features list)
 - rust-lang#96777 (Make the test `check-pass` not to produce a JSON file)
 - rust-lang#96822 (Enforce quote rule for JS source code)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit eecc046 into rust-lang:master May 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone May 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants