Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement fs::get_path for FreeBSD. #98211

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2022
Merged

Implement fs::get_path for FreeBSD. #98211

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2022

Conversation

devnexen
Copy link
Contributor

Using F_KINFO fcntl flag, the kf_structsize field
needs to be set beforehand for that effect.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 17, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 17, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 18, 2022
@JohnCSimon
Copy link
Member

Ping from triage:
@devnexen - What is the status of this PR? If you're not moving forward with this, please close it.

FYI: when a PR is ready for review, send a message containing
@rustbot ready to switch to S-waiting-on-review so the PR is in the reviewer's backlog.

@devnexen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 24, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Hm, so looking at how large that struct is, I'm now wondering if we should be placing it on the heap -- it seems like a kilobyte+ is a pretty big thing to stick onto the stack. I think our stacks are typically a few megabytes, and this function can't see any recursion, but the heap allocation is also likely to be pretty cheap when we're making a syscall anyway.

It looks like on other platforms the get_path helpers all use a heap allocation, so adding one here won't be too odd hopefully.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 24, 2022
@rustbot

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@devnexen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 24, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 24, 2022

📌 Commit 5803492 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 24, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#98211 - devnexen:get_path_freebsd, r=Mark-S…
6e28b0e 
…imulacrum

Implement `fs::get_path` for FreeBSD.

Using `F_KINFO` fcntl flag, the kf_structsize field
needs to be set beforehand for that effect.
@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2022
Closed
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Failed in rollup: #99726 (comment)
@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 25, 2022
@devnexen
Copy link
Contributor Author

oh I forgot it was only amd64 arch...

@devnexen
Implement fs::get_path for FreeBSD.
e39b44a 
Using `F_KINFO` fcntl flag, the kf_structsize field
needs to be set beforehand for that effect.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 25, 2022

📌 Commit e39b44a has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 25, 2022
@JohnTitor JohnTitor mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2022
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#99745 - JohnTitor:rollup-lvrie64, r=JohnTitor
b629c85 
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#98211 (Implement `fs::get_path` for FreeBSD.)
 - rust-lang#99353 (Slightly improve mismatched GAT where clause error)
 - rust-lang#99593 (Suggest removing the tuple struct field for the unwrapped value)
 - rust-lang#99615 (Remove some explicit `self.infcx` for `FnCtxt`, which already derefs into `InferCtxt`)
 - rust-lang#99711 (Remove reachable coverage without counters)
 - rust-lang#99718 (Avoid `&str`/`Symbol` to `String` conversions)
 - rust-lang#99720 (Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d3acd00 into rust-lang:master Jul 26, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jul 26, 2022
bjorn3 pushed a commit to bjorn3/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#99745 - JohnTitor:rollup-lvrie64, r=JohnTitor
1fb02e0 
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#98211 (Implement `fs::get_path` for FreeBSD.)
 - rust-lang#99353 (Slightly improve mismatched GAT where clause error)
 - rust-lang#99593 (Suggest removing the tuple struct field for the unwrapped value)
 - rust-lang#99615 (Remove some explicit `self.infcx` for `FnCtxt`, which already derefs into `InferCtxt`)
 - rust-lang#99711 (Remove reachable coverage without counters)
 - rust-lang#99718 (Avoid `&str`/`Symbol` to `String` conversions)
 - rust-lang#99720 (Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum left review comments

Assignees

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.64.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@devnexen @rust-highfive @JohnCSimon @Mark-Simulacrum @rustbot @bors @JohnTitor