Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update measureme to the latest version #98471

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2022

Conversation

wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 24, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 25, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 25, 2022

⌛ Trying commit 03904bbcafd24ea2ba5b3dd99ae62c9da4f83691 with merge 1542ac21c659985d94b05268c55e187570538a31...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 25, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 1542ac21c659985d94b05268c55e187570538a31 (1542ac21c659985d94b05268c55e187570538a31)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued 1542ac21c659985d94b05268c55e187570538a31 with parent fdca237, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1542ac21c659985d94b05268c55e187570538a31): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
0.7% 1.1% 9
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
0.7% 0.8% 6
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) 0.7% 1.1% 9

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
2.1% 2.1% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
2.8% 3.0% 3
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) 2.8% 3.0% 3

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jun 25, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Jun 25, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 25, 2022

📌 Commit 03904bbcafd24ea2ba5b3dd99ae62c9da4f83691 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 25, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 26, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #98518) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 26, 2022
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased and resolved merge conflict.

@klensy
Copy link
Contributor

klensy commented Jul 8, 2022

Looks like that one lost r+ on rebasing.

@wesleywiser wesleywiser added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 19, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 23, 2022

📌 Commit 6108caa has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 23, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 23, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 6108caa with merge 0e7c843...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 23, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 0e7c843 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 23, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 0e7c843 into rust-lang:master Jul 23, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jul 23, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0e7c843): comparison url.

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-2.5% -2.5% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) -2.5% -2.5% 1

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: mixed results
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
3.3% 3.3% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-2.6% -2.6% 2
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) -0.6% 3.3% 3

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2

  2. number of relevant changes 2

@rustbot rustbot removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jul 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants