Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

font request: Recursive Mono #845

Closed
3 tasks done
laxtiz opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 12 comments · Fixed by #1576
Closed
3 tasks done

font request: Recursive Mono #845

laxtiz opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 12 comments · Fixed by #1576

Comments

@laxtiz
Copy link

laxtiz commented Jun 17, 2022

Requirements

  • I have searched the issues for my request and found nothing related and/or helpful
  • I have searched the FAQ for help
  • I have searched the Wiki for help

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
no problem, but a new font family.

Describe the solution you'd like
i want use patched font with neovim.

Describe alternatives you've considered
i tried to patch by myself, but i don't know why my os(Fedora Linux 36 with gnome 42) not recognized as monospaced font.
i need help from others.

Additional context
the font's info:

@Finii
Copy link
Collaborator

Finii commented Jun 20, 2022

Maybe my answer here: #847 is useful.

You need to specify --mono to get a really monospaced font.

I run my neovim with a non-monospaced font. Why do you need it monospaced?
That is probably dependend on the terminal you run neovim in. But you did not specify any. I use tilix ;-)

@ghe0
Copy link

ghe0 commented Sep 30, 2022

If you do patch recursive, I would also like to use it.

@laxtiz laxtiz closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 16, 2023
@zrooda
Copy link

zrooda commented Feb 23, 2023

Would love to see Recursive available for download pre-patched!

@Finii
Copy link
Collaborator

Finii commented Feb 23, 2023

Added to

@Jobin-Nelson
Copy link

Any update on this one, Would really be happy to see this font added

@Finii
Copy link
Collaborator

Finii commented May 30, 2023

Working on v3.0.2 to fix the last (cough) bugs of 3.0.0.

This can be added in v3.1 earliest.

And it has 64 font styles and weights. That would probably needed to be skinned down.
If this would be a font with 4 files or something, a classic RIBBI group.
The current release scheme is rather bad for big families.

Maybe you can give a description why this font is so great and different from all the others :-D

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2023

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity (i.e. last half year) after it was closed. It helps our maintainers focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar, please open a new issue, complete the issue template with all the details necessary to reproduce, and mention this issue as reference.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 4, 2023
@Finii
Copy link
Collaborator

Finii commented Dec 21, 2023

@joaomcarlos Thanks for reminding me!

We should start choosing fonts for the next release. After xmas probably.

Sad to see Recursive Mono Casual was not added :/

Its an insanely good font for UI and Terminal displays and for code its specially fun.

https://www.recursive.design/

These types of handwritten style fonts reduce fatigue and improve readability in high vibration environments (a similar font is used in the B1 bomber for example)

Repository owner unlocked this conversation Dec 21, 2023
@yaaama
Copy link

yaaama commented Feb 13, 2024

I really do have to bump this thread because Recursive is probably my new favourite font.

I was using source code pro (NF patched) for 5+ years in the terminal without change but "Rec Mono Semicasual" variant took its place because of how nice it is to use and its legibility is superb even with tired eyes.

so a +1 from me!

@Finii
Copy link
Collaborator

Finii commented Feb 13, 2024

Tnx for the feedback!

@joaomcarlos
Copy link

I've switched to Rec Mono Casual in both terminal and code editors. It works pretty well for code and interfaces in the terminal like NeoVim menus. It also works extremely well with vibrant colors which many fonts fail at while working well with muted colors like almost all others, so very versatile on that front. It also works with pastel colors like Catpuccin theme.

And doesnt look terrible when subpixel rendering isnt available like the Ubuntu font, or when the font rendering pipeline is a little wonky (linux) which is a plus when working with multiple systems (tested on Mac and PopOs).

This xmas surprise (for me anyway) keeps on giving

Finii added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 30, 2024
'for Code' variants.

Rename RecMonoSemicausal to RecMonoSemi to avoid too long font names
after we add 'Nerd Font Mono' )or even (NFM) to it.

Fixes: #845

Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <[email protected]>
@Finii Finii mentioned this issue Mar 30, 2024
2 tasks
Finii added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 30, 2024
'for Code' variants.

Rename RecMonoSemicausal to RecMonoSemi to avoid too long font names
after we add 'Nerd Font Mono' )or even (NFM) to it.

Fixes: #845

Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <[email protected]>
hasecilu pushed a commit to hasecilu/nerd-fonts that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2024
'for Code' variants.

Rename RecMonoSemicausal to RecMonoSemi to avoid too long font names
after we add 'Nerd Font Mono' )or even (NFM) to it.

Fixes: ryanoasis#845

Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity (i.e. last half year) after it was closed. It helps our maintainers focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar, please open a new issue, complete the issue template with all the details necessary to reproduce, and mention this issue as reference.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants