Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prompt_toolkit: Set version constraint for conda #36659

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2023

Conversation

mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

@mkoeppe mkoeppe commented Nov 5, 2023

Replaces #36560.

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

@mkoeppe mkoeppe self-assigned this Nov 5, 2023
@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-10.2 milestone Nov 5, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 7dabb0a; changes) is ready! 🎉

Copy link
Contributor

@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why only in the conda file and not also in install_requires?

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Nov 7, 2023

Because it's already there

@mkoeppe mkoeppe requested a review from dimpase November 7, 2023 17:17
Copy link
Member

@dimpase dimpase left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Nov 7, 2023

Thanks!

@vbraun vbraun merged commit 781dbff into sagemath:develop Nov 10, 2023
29 of 41 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants