-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
add test for high-durability dependency validation
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
131 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ | ||
/// Test that high durabilities can't cause "access tracked struct from previous revision" panic. | ||
/// | ||
/// The test models a situation where we have two File inputs (0, 1), where `File(0)` has LOW | ||
/// durability and `File(1)` has HIGH durability. We can query an `index` for each file, and a | ||
/// `definitions` from that index (just a sub-part of the index), and we can `infer` each file. The | ||
/// `index` and `definitions` queries depend only on the `File` they operate on, but the `infer` | ||
/// query has some other dependencies: `infer(0)` depends on `infer(1)`, and `infer(1)` also | ||
/// depends directly on `File(0)`. | ||
/// | ||
/// The panic occurs (in versions of Salsa without a fix) because `definitions(1)` is high | ||
/// durability, and depends on `index(1)` which is also high durability. `index(1)` creates the | ||
/// tracked struct `Definition(1)`, and `infer(1)` (which is low durability) depends on | ||
/// `Definition.file(1)`. | ||
/// | ||
/// After a change to `File(0)` (low durability), we only shallowly verify `definitions(1)` -- it | ||
/// passes shallow verification due to durability. We take care to mark-validated the outputs of | ||
/// `definitions(1)`, but we never verify `index(1)` at all (deeply or shallowly), which means we | ||
/// never mark `Definition(1)` validated. So when we deep-verify `infer(1)`, we try to access its | ||
/// dependency `Definition.file(1)`, and hit the panic because we are accessing a tracked struct | ||
/// that has never been re-validated or re-recreated in R2. | ||
use salsa::{Durability, Setter}; | ||
|
||
#[salsa::db] | ||
trait Db: salsa::Database { | ||
fn file(&self, idx: usize) -> File; | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::input] | ||
struct File { | ||
field: usize, | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::tracked] | ||
struct Definition<'db> { | ||
file: File, | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::tracked] | ||
struct Index<'db> { | ||
definitions: Definitions<'db>, | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::tracked] | ||
struct Definitions<'db> { | ||
definition: Definition<'db>, | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::tracked] | ||
struct Inference<'db> { | ||
definition: Definition<'db>, | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::tracked] | ||
fn index<'db>(db: &'db dyn Db, file: File) -> Index<'db> { | ||
let _ = file.field(db); | ||
Index::new(db, Definitions::new(db, Definition::new(db, file))) | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::tracked] | ||
fn definitions<'db>(db: &'db dyn Db, file: File) -> Definitions<'db> { | ||
index(db, file).definitions(db) | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::tracked] | ||
fn infer<'db>(db: &'db dyn Db, definition: Definition<'db>) -> Inference<'db> { | ||
let file = definition.file(db); | ||
if file.field(db) < 1 { | ||
let dependent_file = db.file(1); | ||
infer(db, definitions(db, dependent_file).definition(db)) | ||
} else { | ||
db.file(0).field(db); | ||
index(db, file); | ||
Inference::new(db, definition) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::tracked] | ||
fn check<'db>(db: &'db dyn Db, file: File) -> Inference<'db> { | ||
let defs = definitions(db, file); | ||
infer(db, defs.definition(db)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[test] | ||
fn execute() { | ||
#[salsa::db] | ||
#[derive(Default)] | ||
struct Database { | ||
storage: salsa::Storage<Self>, | ||
files: Vec<File>, | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::db] | ||
impl salsa::Database for Database { | ||
fn salsa_event(&self, _event: &dyn Fn() -> salsa::Event) {} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[salsa::db] | ||
impl Db for Database { | ||
fn file(&self, idx: usize) -> File { | ||
self.files[idx] | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
let mut db = Database::default(); | ||
// Create a file 0 with low durability, and a file 1 with high durability. | ||
|
||
let file0 = File::new(&db, 0); | ||
db.files.push(file0); | ||
|
||
let file1 = File::new(&db, 1); | ||
file1 | ||
.set_field(&mut db) | ||
.with_durability(Durability::HIGH) | ||
.to(1); | ||
db.files.push(file1); | ||
|
||
// check(0) -> infer(0) -> definitions(0) -> index(0) | ||
// \-> infer(1) -> definitions(1) -> index(1) | ||
|
||
assert_eq!(check(&db, file0).definition(&db).file(&db).field(&db), 1); | ||
|
||
// update the low durability file 0 | ||
file0.set_field(&mut db).to(0); | ||
|
||
// Re-query check(0). definitions(1) is high durability so it short-circuits in shallow-verify, | ||
// meaning we never verify index(1) at all, but index(1) created the tracked struct | ||
// Definition(1), so we never validate Definition(1) in R2, so when we try to verify | ||
// Definition.file(1) (as an input of infer(1) ) we hit a panic for trying to use a struct that | ||
// isn't validated in R2. | ||
check(&db, file0); | ||
} |