Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Limit number of errors returned (when variables are used) #1034
Limit number of errors returned (when variables are used) #1034
Changes from all commits
81914d3
5deba0a
635db88
a7a9d6a
3e5a563
9e60707
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using mutable variable was the only viable option here to avoid making huge refactoring and keeping the same signature of the original method (by returning Vector[Violation]).
The alternative 1 was to use ListBuffer[Violation] but it would require making signature changes (probably just to return Unit) + it didn't work well with
.map(ListValueViolation(0, _, sourceMapper, Nil))
.The alternative 2 was to propagate the number of errors back to the recursion function but I was not able to make it work properly 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I created a separate recursion function (basically the old method migrated here for the most part) to be called internally so it has easy access to mutable variable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So instead of returning Vector(violation), we call
addViolation(violation)
that mutates number of errors and returns the same Vector(violation)