Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/client to ^6.22.2 #7625

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 17, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/client (source) ^6.22.1 -> ^6.22.2 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2024 10:32
@renovate renovate bot requested review from rexxars and removed request for a team October 17, 2024 10:32
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 17, 2024 4:18pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 17, 2024 4:18pm
test-compiled-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 17, 2024 4:18pm
test-next-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 17, 2024 4:18pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 17, 2024 4:18pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 17, 2024 4:18pm

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Component Testing Report Updated Oct 17, 2024 4:15 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 44s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 9s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 30s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 39s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 10s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 3m 0s 0 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 45s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 45s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 19s 18 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 9s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/RangeDecoration.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 9 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 18s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 37s 12 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2024

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:17:54 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 14.9 efps (67ms) 15.9 efps (63ms) -4ms (-6.0%)
article (body) 52.1 efps (19ms) 56.2 efps (18ms) -1ms (-7.3%)
article (string inside object) 16.7 efps (60ms) 17.2 efps (58ms) -2ms (-3.3%)
article (string inside array) 13.5 efps (74ms) 14.1 efps (71ms) -3ms (-4.1%)
recipe (name) 30.3 efps (33ms) 31.3 efps (32ms) -1ms (-3.0%)
recipe (description) 34.5 efps (29ms) 34.5 efps (29ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 14.0 efps (72ms) 14.5 efps (69ms) -3ms (-3.5%)
synthetic (string inside object) 14.5 efps (69ms) 15.2 efps (66ms) -3ms (-4.3%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 67ms 72ms 91ms 229ms 662ms 14.7s
article (body) 19ms 21ms 44ms 176ms 333ms 6.4s
article (string inside object) 60ms 63ms 68ms 210ms 229ms 8.7s
article (string inside array) 74ms 78ms 88ms 199ms 1116ms 10.1s
recipe (name) 33ms 35ms 55ms 101ms 9ms 9.7s
recipe (description) 29ms 31ms 35ms 62ms 0ms 5.9s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 9ms 10ms 0ms 3.2s
synthetic (title) 72ms 76ms 82ms 164ms 1598ms 16.6s
synthetic (string inside object) 69ms 79ms 85ms 177ms 1758ms 10.7s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 63ms 69ms 76ms 199ms 536ms 13.6s
article (body) 18ms 21ms 44ms 236ms 298ms 6.4s
article (string inside object) 58ms 61ms 69ms 254ms 401ms 8.8s
article (string inside array) 71ms 74ms 80ms 292ms 1117ms 10.0s
recipe (name) 32ms 34ms 55ms 73ms 10ms 9.1s
recipe (description) 29ms 30ms 43ms 137ms 0ms 6.2s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 9ms 23ms 0ms 3.3s
synthetic (title) 69ms 72ms 78ms 113ms 1082ms 15.9s
synthetic (string inside object) 66ms 70ms 72ms 348ms 1272ms 10.5s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@rexxars rexxars added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 18, 2024
Any commits made after this event will not be merged.
Merged via the queue into next with commit 2e150f1 Oct 18, 2024
66 checks passed
@rexxars rexxars deleted the renovate/sanity-client-6.x branch October 18, 2024 14:17
bjoerge added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
* next:
  chore(deps): update dependency sanity-diff-patch to v4 (#7630)
  feat: validate PR title against conventional commits (#7580)
  chore(deps): update dependency @sanity/tsdoc to v1.0.113 (#7627)
  fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/client to ^6.22.2 (#7625)
  chore(deps): update typescript-tooling (#7605)
  fix: restore support for defaultOrdering. (#7626)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant