-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
XEC spike diversity issue #2088
Comments
Very good idea, i will try to help. do u prefer direct editing or highlighting in the comments? I would require also that the lineage has to be sampled at least once in September ( or last 30 days) to avoid dead ends |
Sure, you can do direct editing. |
Branch 7: XEC+Orf1a:A599T+S:S680F (furin), 5seqs (1xFrance, 1xCanada, 3xUS). Arose 2x independently (all US sequences are separated on the Orf1a:T2274I subbranch). All seqs less than 1 month old. Query: G2060A, C23601T |
Branch 9: XEC+Orf1a:A599T+S:E1202Q, 2 seqs, France + Ireland. Query: G2060A,C11020T,G25166C |
Br.7 went to 8 with three GBW samples from Peru' (2 patients) |
Branch 10/11: XEC+S:W152R (defining for Centaurus) arose convergently: Branch 10 via T22016A (1xNL, 1xFR). Branch 11 via T22016C (1xIR, 1xUSA). All seqs sampled in September |
Branch 12: XEC+S:T678I (C23595T), furin-adjacent. 4xCAN, 2xFR, 2xUSA. Convergent: one on the Orf1a:I1367L, the rest on the Orf1a:A599T polytomy. All seqs sampled in September |
Please separate these branches and ensure every branch is monoplyetic. |
Branch 14: XEC+S:P1263L(C25350T), same site as branch 13. 1xSW,1xPL. |
Please check with usher before proposing. They seem to be on different usher branches. If they are on different usher branches it is likely they emerge separately and shouldn't be treated as one. Unless you provide reason (artifact, usher-flip flop, convergent other mutations like branch 7, etc. ) to merge them. |
IMO, at present the relatively low number of XEC seqs makes it hard to correctly assess the phylogeny, the resolution is still insufficient. The total XEC Usher tree still places most seqs on polytomy. |
@aviczhl2 i think soon we will be force to raise the parameters to three places and 10 seqs, i tell this because in my previous experience with spike diversity issues it rapidly becomes very mess or too long with the opposite effect to risk hiding something fast instead of highlighting it. It is not yet the moment but we shopuld think about it. |
Branch 15: XEC+Orf1a:A599T+S:K182N. 3xNL, 1xENG, 1xCanary Islands (with additional S:M153I). Monophyletic, query: C829T, A22108T |
Not a Branch but worth tracking: XEC + Orf1a:A599T+ S:A475V |
Solved 5 now from Br.8 also from Germany it looks interesting
|
Branch 16: XEC+Orf1a:A599T+S:G72R. 5 seqs, 5 countries: Denmark, Netherlands, France (with S:K113R), Canada, GBW from Mexico. Query: G2060A, G21776A,T3565C (edited) |
i ve added T3565C to exclude old samples. |
You can directly edit the task list. But be cautious on cvejris proposals that may not be monophyletic. |
yeah i m a bit confused about the branch numbering . @cvejris i suggest just to add the lineage you find without a branch number |
It seems that there is, and will be a lot of spike diversity in XEC. Better gather them in one issue.
Only count for branches with more than 2 places.
GPT Model trained on August data(seqs before XEC appears) predicts 4 spike mutations for XEC on top potential mutation list: S:T572I, S:R346T, S:N185D, S:A688V.
Tasks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: