We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8118fd5
f a; .g b, c; .h d
↓
f a .g b, c .h d
Line-leading dots are working this way already. Expanding it to spaced dots seems acceptable.
Considering this must beat () in both conciseness and readability, postfix ! is probably the only contender.
()
!
f().g()
f!.g!
Semiautovivification (with ADI) conflicts, but can be adjusted. (a!b wasn't very intuitive anyway.)
a!b
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Nice, I'm liking it. postfix ! is much better than do because do func is actually longer than func(). Space leading dots are also very nice.
do
do func
func()
Sorry, something went wrong.
coffee#1407: #64: spaced dots now close implicit calls
e806329
dc290f5
fix repl, closes satyr#64
12740f9
No branches or pull requests
with arguments
8118fd5
↓
Line-leading dots are working this way already. Expanding it to spaced dots seems acceptable.
without arguments
Considering this must beat
()
in both conciseness and readability, postfix!
is probably the only contender.↓
Semiautovivification (with ADI) conflicts, but can be adjusted. (
a!b
wasn't very intuitive anyway.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: