Add enabledInspections setting

[gsrajesh89]

Currently we have disabledInspections setting to disable the inspections.
To support incremental enable of rules we can use the enabledInspections setting to enable certain set of rules.
disabledInspections takes precedence over enabledInspections

[ches]

Hi @mccartney, do you have the access rights (and time) for maintaining the sbt plugin?

This looks like a straightforward change to expose configurability that already exists as a command line flag.

(Perhaps we could define GitHub teams in the org like @scapegoat-scala/gradle-maintainers and put them in CODEOWNERS files in the repos, to help contributors know who can review PRs).

[mccartney]

@ches Thanks for tagging me.

To be honest I lack knowledge and experience with sbt. I simply don't use it (except for some open source projects like scapegoat). I haven't used sbt-scapegoat anywhere, thus I lack the focus.

As to permissions - I think I have permissions to (review and) merge the change. But I don't think I have permissions to publish a new version.

As to defining CODEOWNERS - that's a good idea. It doesn't necessarily have to be the same set of people for each of the subprojects.

@sksamuel can decide.

[mccartney]

Having said, the code looks fine to me. Thank you for your contribution. Merging it.

[chameleon82]

@sksamuel could you help to release new version with those changes?

[Johnnei]

@mccartney @sksamuel We are still heavily using sbt as our built tool, so it would be great if we could sort out the publishing rights. We still have a few more enhancements/bug-fixes in the pipeline based on our rollout to a few hundred projects.
I'm also happy to help maintaining the plugin to give a bit more knowledge on sbt (although I'm not super confident there myself as well).

[mccartney]

Ack. As mentioned above, I never had the publishing rights here. I think it's @sksamuel who has them. And can decide on maintenance of the plugin. I very much like your offer and support it.

[sksamuel]

@Johnnei @mccartney you both want admin rights on this repo, then you could publish etc ?

[Johnnei]

@Johnnei @mccartney you both want admin rights on this repo, then you could publish etc ?

I think that would be great to get updates going again. As I'm still new to contributing to scapegoat eco granting it only to @mccartney might be a bit more trustworthy as he publishes for scapegoat itself as well. I'll leave that call up to you of course :)

[sksamuel]

@Johnnei is invited as a collaborator. @mccartney you are now an admin.