Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using 3.0mm MDF (Ponoko no longer carries 3.2mm) #76

Closed
ericyeargan opened this issue Nov 20, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #93
Closed

Using 3.0mm MDF (Ponoko no longer carries 3.2mm) #76

ericyeargan opened this issue Nov 20, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #93
Assignees
Labels
area: documentation Wiki, README, other documentation needs

Comments

@ericyeargan
Copy link
Contributor

The OpenSCAD script and ordering guide specify 3.2mm MDF for the laster-cut parts. Unfortunately, it looks like Ponoko no longer carries 3.2mm. In some commentary in the ordering guide @scottbez1 suggests that it's possible that the material was always 3.0mm and that the Ponoko was just listing it incorrectly as 3.2mm.

So, I tried ordering a parts using 3.0mm MDF with the latest release but things don't fit quite right - there are visible gaps in the slots and a good amount of give when you lightly twist the spindle. (FYI, when measuring the material thickness with calipers, it's right around 2.99mm).

I've also tried modifying the OpenSCAD to change the material width to 3.0mm and update the kerf. I ordered parts with that updated pattern and things fit better although there's very little/no clearance between the spindle and sides. I had to reduce the top spindle speed to keep the motor from stalling - I suspect because the spindle is rubbing slightly against the sides. You can view the commit with the OpenSCAD change here.

Curious if anyone else has dealt with this. My ultimate goal is to build 12 modules. Right now, I'm trying to decide wether to mess with the 3.0mm SCAD to increase the spindle clearance or to just live with a loose fit on the 3.2mm SCAD (maybe through some liberal CA glue application).

P.S. Despite these issues, I've been having a blast with this project. Thanks @scottbez1 and all of the contributors!

@DrSkunk
Copy link

DrSkunk commented Nov 21, 2019

Ah, weird, I cut out from 3mm myself and it fit very well together. Maybe there is a kerf difference between my lasercutter, a trotec speedy 300, and the one ponoko uses.

@ericyeargan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @whitebird. I should note that I haven't actually built the entire module with the unmodified pattern. Maybe I'll find that it works just fine once everything's bolted together.

@ericyeargan
Copy link
Contributor Author

The Ponoko 3mm ended up working pretty well. I did have to apply some glue to the spindle joints. Otherwise, it would get out of wack if you applied even a little torsion to the sides. The only other issue is that the tabs stick out very slightly from the front panel/face. That probably wouldn't be an issue for most people but I'm thinking about covering the fronts in a wood veneer so I need it to be fairly flat. It's easy to sand those down though before attaching the front panel.

I'll leave this issue open in case @scottbez1 wants to update the ordering instructions. Otherwise, feel free to close.

@scottbez1 scottbez1 added the area: documentation Wiki, README, other documentation needs label Apr 18, 2020
@scottbez1 scottbez1 self-assigned this Apr 18, 2020
scottbez1 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2020
This PR fixes a few issues relating to panel thickness:

 - Spool width now accounts for flap width. If the calculated spool width is smaller than the flap width, the enclosure width and front opening do not shrink further. This also comments out the legacyAssert for spool width which is no longer needed.
- Flap notch height and depth are now static and reflect the die-cut flap dimensions. The flap height can be set back to auto with the flap_notch_height_auto flag.
- Enclosure side bolts are now positioned properly for all thicknesses
- The enclosure vertical inset (distance between top/bottom of front and top/bottom pieces) now has a minimum value to prevent the bolt heads and nut edges from extending past the bounds of the enclosure at thinner thicknesses
- Sets the default thickness to 3.0, matching Ponoko's current MDF availability. Tentatively closes #76
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: documentation Wiki, README, other documentation needs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants