Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add subscription ID recognition to tungstenite and ws-rpc client #662
Add subscription ID recognition to tungstenite and ws-rpc client #662
Changes from all commits
154e49b
f470b0a
da11078
fa54d27
66b36d3
b110bef
71ce17d
524b196
8770206
e3c5206
b9f1c38
bb5ee28
e03ef62
6460173
994e57a
b8aea24
867845d
3ec0c30
98df866
4243aee
86dfc27
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I understand, all the following logic is analyzing a string. I would put this logic into its own function and write a test for each flow through. Then you know, that it's doing what you expect.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, unit testing does make sense here. But not just here, but also in the ws_client and other functions of this client. Would you agree to do that in a separate issue and PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would add tests for new logic from this PR in this PR. For adding tests to existing code, I would create a new issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added issue: #663, commit adding unit tests for changed code is incoming.