You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
a) Unix philosophy: One tool per task.
we drop the key generation by stenc and just provide a manual with shell commands to generate a secure key and explain how to test the random source.
(see also #3)
b) use a proper C++ library
Also include a parameter, which will send a huge amount of the used random to stdout for test purpose:
# user can test, if his library and random source are working.
$> stenc --test-rnd | entropy_checker
Shannon entropy is 8.8
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jonasstein
changed the title
Get good random numbers by c++ function/lib, not via OS
Get good random numbers externally, or by c++ function/lib but not via OS
Apr 20, 2022
(b) seems to cause the most work for us without any benefit. I like option (a) most. Users can use their beloved tool to generate the random key. Either a hardware TRNG, a set of tools on the commandline, or whatever. Our key generator will never be better than what the user already has.
But this change should go to a major milestone release, if we go this way. @ninthclowd what Do you think about it?
Personally I like your idea of dropping key generation and leave it to tools that are built for that purpose. Maybe just update the man pages with an example of how to do so with openssl?
I also think removing key generation and documenting how to use utilities makes the most sense. Off the top of my head openssl rand -hex 32 or xxd -p -l 32 -c 64 /dev/urandom do the job.
To not pull random numbers via OS.
Two possible solutions:
a) Unix philosophy: One tool per task.
we drop the key generation by
stenc
and just provide a manual with shell commands to generate a secure key and explain how to test the random source.(see also #3)
b) use a proper C++ library
Also include a parameter, which will send a huge amount of the used random to
stdout
for test purpose:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: