Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gpu ci with conda cuda12.3 #1360

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Gpu ci with conda cuda12.3 #1360

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

ivirshup
Copy link
Member

@ivirshup ivirshup commented Feb 7, 2024

Branch off of #1358 to test using new cuda (since it used to work)

@ivirshup ivirshup marked this pull request as draft February 7, 2024 13:31
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4b4c92f) 85.83% compared to head (434cf07) 83.71%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1360      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.83%   83.71%   -2.13%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        5564     5564              
==========================================
- Hits         4776     4658     -118     
- Misses        788      906     +118     
Flag Coverage Δ
gpu-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 7 files with indirect coverage changes

@Intron7
Copy link
Member

Intron7 commented Feb 7, 2024

scverse/rapids_singlecell#124 I also have some issues testing for cuda-12

@ivirshup
Copy link
Member Author

ivirshup commented Feb 7, 2024

It's particularly strange since this our jobs here used to install cuda 12.3 and worked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants