Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Currently, scikit-survival only supports right censored events, that
means when a lower bound on the true time of an event is known.
If you only have a upper bound on the true event time, this called left
censoring. This is currently not supported, I'm afraid.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Answer selected by
ogencoglu
-
Censoring is not restricted to analyzing time, it applies to any
continues variable where you only have partial information.
Your example of having a senor that cannot measure below a certain
threshold would indeed be an example for left censored data.
Another non time-related example would be the selling of online ads.
Typically, the opportunity to display an ad goes to the highest bidder.
Hence, if you are not the winner the price of the ad is right censored.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I have a machine learning problem of regression (not survival) where I have certain numerical and categorical input features and am trying to predict a numerical outcome. I know for a fact that the phenomena is highly non-linear. The problem has nothing to do with survival in that sense.
But for some of the outcomes (target values), I just know that they are below certain value. I don't know the exact value. Therefore I can not use standard scikit-learn regression models here as I can not calculate the loss accurately. Is survival analysis suitable for this use case?
Is there any fundamental mathematical or algorithmic difference between left-censoring and right-censoring in this context? For example, can I multiply my targets by -1 which will turn <20 to >-20 and switch from left-censoring to right censoring and the results will be the same?
Does it support negative target values just like regular regression? Or does survival analysis assume some physical meaning of "survival" and therefore negative target values does not make sense or anything like that?
In summary: how generalizable survival analysis is to arbitrary regression problems where there is some censoring in the targets?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions