-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding penalty_factor to CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis #102
Comments
For now I've worked out and tested a workaround using |
Can be used to have features entering the model unpenalized. Fixes #102
Can be used to have features entering the model unpenalized. Fixes #102
Dear @sebp - I know I'm not supposed to ask survival analysis questions here, and I did post a question on Cross Validated, but I would appreciate very much you feedback because after doing a literature search I cannot find any answers. When running non-Cox, non-regression scikit-survival ML survival analysis methods, for example |
It would be very useful to also support a
penalty_factor
inCoxPHSurvivalAnalysis
in order to always include unpenalized covariates in the model. This is important when you need to adjust for e.g. known prognostic clinical or molecular covariates which shouldn't be penalized. This is something supported for Cox ridge regression in for example thepenalized
R package.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: