Use pointer cursor on slider ticks #849
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
merged and published to v10.2.0. thanks again for your contribution @edemaine! |
|
Great, thanks! Published version works well. |
edemaine
added a commit
to edemaine/coauthor
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm now updating from a very old version of this package, and I found that this CSS rule got removed somehow. In my application, all the possible options are marked with ticks, and the ticks are clickable. Yet the
cursor: pointerrule somehow only applies everywhere except the tick marks (probably because of a change in how the tick marks arepositioned). Thus I found it necessary to make the tick marks also have thecursor: pointerrule.Here's a screenshot of my use-case. Unfortunately, I can't get the screenshot to show the cursor, but it is correct.