Vitest #632
Merged
Vitest #632
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I think vitest was mixing up a coupld of similar-looking snapshots, sometimes
other tests rely on it
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #632 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.10% 99.57% +0.46%
==========================================
Files 12 12
Lines 447 1409 +962
Branches 95 255 +160
==========================================
+ Hits 443 1403 +960
- Misses 4 6 +2
... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 Codecov offers a browser extension for seamless coverage viewing on GitHub. Try it in Chrome or Firefox today! |
|
Released in v3.5.0-0. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Switching from jest to vitest. This might make the move to first-class-ESM easier, since there'll be less dependency hell to worry about (jest, ts-jest, ...)