Skip to content

six-two/mkdocs-vercel-basic-auth-example

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

25 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Vercel authentication for MkDocs sites

These rely on Vercel's routing capabilities to route all unauthenticated requests to an error page. See the subfolders for different approaches. This has some drawbacks when it comes to security:

  • You can not update credentials on the fly. To update credentials you need a new deployment and the old credentials will remain valid on the old deployment. So you should delete all deployments if you think that your credentials were compromised.
  • There is (as far as I know) no way to prevent automated attacks. So your password / access key should be relatively strong so that attackers can not guess it. But since you can store the credentials in a bookmark or QR code using very strong passwords should not be a problem.
  • The documentation I could find on Vercel has not been that good and things often have unexpected behavior. For example I just found out by testing that routes[*].missing.value is also case insensitive. So it is much easier to guess an API key/cookie than I would have expected at first. Also according to this thread to perform a penetration test against your deployments you need an Enterprise plan. So to not break their (in my opinion stupid) rules this code has not been properly tested and likely never will.

Demos

HTTP basic auth

Cookie

Cookie with kill switch

HTTP basic auth

HTTP basic auth will show an popup by the browser. It should be supported by all browsers and the authentication can usually be included in the URL (https://username:[email protected] for stuff like bookmarks). But this way at least Firefox will show a warning due to this sometimes being abused for phishing. And Safari on iOS seems to not support this at all for me, but other browsers such as DuckDuckGo work as expected. Depending on how you browser handles the URL, you might copy the credentials when copying the URL. After you close the browser, the credentials will be forgotten.

Cookie

You need to implement a login form or small page that sets the cookie from URL parameters to allow non-technical users to log in / create a bookmark that logs you in. Depending on the browser's settings cookies either exist until they expire or the browser is closed. You can also create a button or page that deletes the cookie and thus logs the user out.

Cookies are well supported although they may have regulatory problems due to them often being misused for tracking. I am no lawyer, but using a cookie for simply storing the authentication data and not being used for tracking should be fine. But feel free to annoy visitors with a We use a cookie! message they need to click away ;D

If you only want people in the know to log in, you can also in theory remove the login page. Then you can modify your error page to look like your server misfunctions (502 Gateway Error, 500 Internal Server Error, etc). This can provide some plausible deniability / make the site appear like a worthless target. Users knowing the cookie can just open the site, set the cookie manually via the Browser's developer tools and should be logged in.

Cookie with kill switch

The same as the cookie one, but you can only access the latest deployment. The same approach can also be used with other schemes, such as the basic auth example.

This should make accessing your site via old deployments (which may use old, weak or leaked passwords or have weaknesses in the authentication code) no longer possible.