Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: fixes #724: add input for --provenance-repository while image verification #736
feat: fixes #724: add input for --provenance-repository while image verification #736
Changes from 1 commit
2c971c1
c475cc5
36bf836
93ddb5d
cf39061
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you just call
o.VerifyImage.AddFlags(cmd)
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's remove support for COSIGN_REPOSITORY.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1. I was about to suggest this as well since we'll probably want to move to using
sigstore-go
and not rely on cosign packages. The--provenance-repository
option is a better way to implement what we want.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some folks use slsa-verifier's Go API. Could we maybe add a new method
VerifyImageProvenanceRepo
with the new signature rather than modifyVerifyImage
in order to maintain API backwards compatibility?Or maybe it makes sense to add another
options.ImageOptions
(with justProvenanceRepository
on it for now) and add aVerifyImageWithOptions
function instead in order to protect against future API changes? WDUT?/cc @laurentsimon