Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump esbuild from 0.13.4 to 0.13.6 #102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2021

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 14, 2021

Bumps esbuild from 0.13.4 to 0.13.6.

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.13.6

  • Emit decorators for declare class fields (#1675)

    In version 3.7, TypeScript introduced the declare keyword for class fields that avoids generating any code for that field:

    // TypeScript input
    class Foo {
      a: number
      declare b: number
    }
    // JavaScript output
    class Foo {
    a;
    }

    However, it turns out that TypeScript still emits decorators for these omitted fields. With this release, esbuild will now do this too:

    // TypeScript input
    class Foo {
      @decorator a: number;
      @decorator declare b: number;
    }
    // Old JavaScript output
    class Foo {
    a;
    }
    __decorateClass([
    decorator
    ], Foo.prototype, "a", 2);
    // New JavaScript output
    class Foo {
    a;
    }
    __decorateClass([
    decorator
    ], Foo.prototype, "a", 2);
    __decorateClass([
    decorator
    ], Foo.prototype, "b", 2);

  • Experimental support for esbuild on NetBSD (#1624)

    With this release, esbuild now has a published binary executable for NetBSD in the esbuild-netbsd-64 npm package, and esbuild's installer has been modified to attempt to use it when on NetBSD. Hopefully this makes installing esbuild via npm work on NetBSD. This change was contributed by @​gdt.

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

0.13.6

  • Emit decorators for declare class fields (#1675)

    In version 3.7, TypeScript introduced the declare keyword for class fields that avoids generating any code for that field:

    // TypeScript input
    class Foo {
      a: number
      declare b: number
    }
    // JavaScript output
    class Foo {
    a;
    }

    However, it turns out that TypeScript still emits decorators for these omitted fields. With this release, esbuild will now do this too:

    // TypeScript input
    class Foo {
      @decorator a: number;
      @decorator declare b: number;
    }
    // Old JavaScript output
    class Foo {
    a;
    }
    __decorateClass([
    decorator
    ], Foo.prototype, "a", 2);
    // New JavaScript output
    class Foo {
    a;
    }
    __decorateClass([
    decorator
    ], Foo.prototype, "a", 2);
    __decorateClass([
    decorator
    ], Foo.prototype, "b", 2);

  • Experimental support for esbuild on NetBSD (#1624)

... (truncated)

Commits
  • e766a0d publish 0.13.6 to npm
  • d1b4132 avoid direct eval retaining unused imports in ts
  • 6f6a77d fix #1675: run decorators for "declare" fields
  • a7f0ec6 ts: forbid "declare" on non-field class properties
  • 3ae358c ts: forbid "declare" fields from being initialized
  • c4c1ce9 fix subtle minify issues with eval
  • d74ad57 feat: drop catch binding when optional catch binding is supported (#1660)
  • 11d7eac Allow bundled esbuild with ESBUILD_BINARY_PATH (#1678)
  • 203ef65 https in changelog, rebalance makefile
  • fd5c0a4 Add NetBSD amd64 binary (#1624)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code labels Oct 14, 2021
Bumps [esbuild](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild) from 0.13.4 to 0.13.6.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](evanw/esbuild@v0.13.4...v0.13.6)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: esbuild
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/esbuild-0.13.6 branch from fc75312 to f90d82c Compare October 14, 2021 09:04
@smonn smonn merged commit f75e34d into main Oct 15, 2021
@smonn smonn deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/esbuild-0.13.6 branch October 15, 2021 21:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant