-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
igluctl: table ownership setup as part of DDL #225
Milestone
Comments
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 25, 2017
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 26, 2017
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 26, 2017
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 26, 2017
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 29, 2017
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 15, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 19, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 28, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 29, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 29, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 29, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2018
oguzhanunlu
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 6, 2018
rzats
pushed a commit
to snowplow/igluctl
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
MSP suggested adding table ownership setup to be included into DDL of the table. It makes sense as many users simply forget to amend the ownership once the table is created.
I guess this could be achieved with an additional option passed to the command. Something like this:
The command would generate the DDL to
CREATE
the table followed byALTER
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: