-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve emit types #4817
Merged
Merged
improve emit types #4817
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e285439
improve emit types
ZachHaber 72a9624
Align broadcast emits with multiple arguments to reality
ZachHaber 59254e0
Merge branch 'socketio:main' into typescript-emits
ZachHaber 11d4b61
Remove emitWithAck from server and namespace
ZachHaber 7babe9a
convert tsd's expectError uses to `ts-expect-error`
ZachHaber 5aa03c1
remove accidentally left in debugging types & unused imports
ZachHaber c188ab6
improve the serverSideEmitWithAck function types
ZachHaber a01899f
inline the type-fest types to remove the dependency
ZachHaber 0650f19
switch socket.io.test-d.ts to testing lib instead of dist
ZachHaber 1e74f22
remove unused import
ZachHaber de96dc9
Remove the typecast from RemoteSocket timeout
ZachHaber 6cf63e9
Remove events with acks from the server and namespace emits
ZachHaber b0ffab7
Delete .vscode/settings.json
darrachequesne File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"typescript.tsdk": "node_modules/typescript/lib" | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couldn't we move the
DecorateAcknowledgementsWithMultipleResponses
type to theBroadcastOperator
class, so we don't have to apply it everytime?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I definitely think that would be nicer; however after looking at the code, I don't think we can.
The
BroadcastOperator
has anexpectSingleResponse
flag, which changes the behavior between single responses and multiple. With that, the options I see are to either: apply the decorations when switching to aBroadcastOperator
, or to setup the expectSingleResponse as a third generic type parameter on the BroadcastOperator.