Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Submodule update]: Update swss and swss-common submodules #1359

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2018
Merged

[Submodule update]: Update swss and swss-common submodules #1359

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2018

Conversation

pavel-shirshov
Copy link
Contributor

- What I did
Update swss and swss-common submodules

- How I did it
git submodule update

- How to verify it
git status
- Description for the changelog

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@pavel-shirshov pavel-shirshov merged commit 1ae86ca into sonic-net:master Feb 1, 2018
@pavel-shirshov pavel-shirshov deleted the pavelsh/update_swss branch February 1, 2018 07:01
abdosi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2021
d324eaec945081f8718468b39a8cf12dae965fd5 (HEAD -> 201911, origin/201911) [PFCWD] Fix 'start' pfcwd command (#1345)
235c61cccbbbb1f948f53b561c98888681b7071a [ecnconfig] handle backend port names when extracting port I/F ID from the port name (#1361)
7f5c3b497148fdd8e710131c5ac3f9f0a5f2cddf Drop explict 3 seconds pause between two object updates/deletes. (#1359)
12c899207917751eac719916be69c0078671963d add vlan_intf_object only if there are ipv4 or ipv6 mappings (#1377)
52ce2c32bf4e267d043a739641f5eefba3f3910f Add  subcommand description to interfaces counters (#1373)
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dosi <[email protected]>
stepanblyschak pushed a commit to stepanblyschak/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request May 10, 2021
…ic-net#1359)

- What I did
Drop explicitly introduced 3 seconds pause between object updates using configlet.

- How I did it
Remove the added time.sleep(3)

- How to verify it
Add 10 objects using old code and see it takes 30+ seconds. Repeat the same with this updated code which would complete in small fraction of a second.

Verified ASIC-DB contents to the extent possible in both scenarios of applying objects using old code with 3 seconds pause and new code w/o any explicit pause, to be the same.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants