Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] [PR:10821] [Arista] skip testing sfp interfaces on Arista-7050QX-32S-S4Q31 #11542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
This is to skip testing SFP interfaces on Arista-7050QX-32S-S4Q31. They were skipped by RJ45 setting (https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/blob/master/tests/platform_tests/conftest.py#L70) by the hwsku.json (https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-buildimage/pull/15251/files#diff-d66b493f5f334902184958f8afcbc387645e4033fe147bf1c0a1ac103d643d0bL5). But for some conflicts on port index setting of different breakout modes, hwsku.json would be deleted to use port_config.ini for the correct port index (sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#17253). The change here is to skip SFP interfaces of Arista-7050QX-32S-S4Q31 in the test code.

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

…c-net#10821)

This is to skip testing SFP interfaces on Arista-7050QX-32S-S4Q31.
They were skipped by RJ45 setting on the hwsku.json. But for some
conflicts on port index setting of different breakout modes, hwsku.json
is deleted to use port_config.ini for the correct port index.
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #10821

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 1139e82 into sonic-net:202205 Feb 1, 2024
10 checks passed
@mssonicbld mssonicbld deleted the cherry/202205/10821 branch February 4, 2024 09:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants