Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

exclude WCS-only layer subsets from plot options #2699

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

kecnry
Copy link
Member

@kecnry kecnry commented Feb 12, 2024

Description

This pull request filters out the wcs-only subset layer (when linked by WCS in imviz) for the subset visibility toggle as well as in the visibility mixed-state logic in the viewer tabs.

Previously:

Screen.Recording.2024-02-12.at.2.23.20.PM.mov

After this PR:

Screen.Recording.2024-02-12.at.3.07.05.PM.mov

Note that the first click is still showing mixed state - that is a broader bug than the scope of this effort. I did some investigation, and PlotOptionsSyncState is requesting that both be updated to be hidden and its not clear where that bug is coming from.

Change log entry

  • Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
    list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
    should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

  • Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
  • Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
  • Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone.
  • After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

@kecnry kecnry added this to the 3.9 milestone Feb 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added imviz plugin Label for plugins common to multiple configurations labels Feb 12, 2024
* both sync state and the visibility mixed state for the viewer select tabs
layer.add_callback('color', self._update_layer_items)
layer.add_callback('visible', self._update_layer_items)
break
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this had to be removed in order for mixed state of new subsets to be shown correctly on the tabs

Comment on lines -1494 to -1495
def is_wcs_only(layer):
return getattr(layer.layer, 'meta', {}).get(self.app._wcs_only_label, False)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

now use the consolidated version imported from utils

Comment on lines -3777 to +3779
elif isinstance(self.value, (int, float)) and self._glue_name != 'percentile':
elif self._glue_name != 'percentile' and isinstance(self.value, (int, float)):
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

technically not related to this effort, but a small cleanup that will avoid the isinstance for all cases that aren't percentile.

Comment on lines +232 to +251
_wcs_only_label = "_WCS_ONLY"


def is_wcs_only(layer):
# exclude WCS-only layers from the layer choices:
if hasattr(layer, 'layer'):
state = layer.layer
elif hasattr(layer, 'data'):
state = layer.data
elif hasattr(layer, 'meta'):
state = layer
else:
raise NotImplementedError
return getattr(state, 'meta', {}).get(_wcs_only_label, False)


def is_not_wcs_only(layer):
return not is_wcs_only(layer)


Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

consolidate all this logic in one place and move _wcs_only_label outside app so that these can be functions instead of methods.

Copy link
Contributor

@pllim pllim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like all the clean-ups and videos demonstrated the fix. Thanks!

Not sure if you also want to do something about this or not, but it is not related to this PR:

wcs_only_key="_WCS_ONLY", data=None,

@kecnry
Copy link
Member Author

kecnry commented Feb 13, 2024

do you mean defaulting to _wcs_only_label instead of the hardcoded string? I think that could easily belong here if that makes sense to you and @bmorris3 doesn't see any reason not to do so.

@pllim
Copy link
Contributor

pllim commented Feb 13, 2024

Re: #2699 (comment)

As long as Python allows that, I think it is okay to change. I know there are some limitations to class API but this is a function, so should be ok?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (fb6d841) 90.83% compared to head (b645527) 90.81%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
jdaviz/utils.py 66.66% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2699      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.83%   90.81%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         163      163              
  Lines       21502    21517      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits        19532    19541       +9     
- Misses       1970     1976       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@gibsongreen gibsongreen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The video demo and local testing matches up, and the code changes look good to me!

@kecnry kecnry merged commit bf46c9b into spacetelescope:main Feb 14, 2024
17 of 19 checks passed
@kecnry kecnry deleted the subset-visible-wcs-only branch February 14, 2024 18:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
imviz plugin Label for plugins common to multiple configurations Ready for final review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants