Prevent recursive matched zoom in Imviz

[kecnry]

Description

This pull request enables the option in the matched zoom within Imviz to disable matched zoom tools in other viewers to avoid unintended recursion. This is consistent with the handling in specviz2d for a similar issue there. We could instead implement some tolerance to break out of the recursion, but I fear that won't be robust and might not behave consistently.

Perhaps #2751 would avoid the need for this, since this was not necessary before the new image rotation work broke roundtripping of the zoom limits.

Note that this was not an issue in 3.8.x, so is not milestoned for backporting.

Change log entry

• Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
  list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
  should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

• Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
• Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
• Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
• Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone. Bugfix milestone also needs an accompanying backport label.
• After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.72%. Comparing base (5afa49f) to head (5b7f068).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2764      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.67%   88.72%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         108      108              
  Lines       16266    16288      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits        14424    14452      +28     
+ Misses       1842     1836       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[gibsongreen]

I was unable to reproduce the bug in standalone, but I was able to do so in a notebook. Bearing this, the fix is, no more wandering images!

[pllim]

Not clear why this was set to False back in #2219 but I think this diff makes sense. Thanks!