Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add notebook to help test sign convention #418

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add notebook to help test sign convention #418

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Skyhawk172
Copy link
Collaborator

In preparation for v1.0 release, here's a notebook to help debug/check that we get our signs correct.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 24, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #418 (9be178a) into develop (67c7c18) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #418   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    48.59%   48.59%           
========================================
  Files           14       14           
  Lines         5772     5772           
========================================
  Hits          2805     2805           
  Misses        2967     2967           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 67c7c18...9be178a. Read the comment docs.

@mperrin
Copy link
Collaborator

mperrin commented Feb 26, 2021

Thanks again, very useful. I adapted this into unit test format in #419

@mperrin
Copy link
Collaborator

mperrin commented Mar 1, 2021

Superseded by #419.

@mperrin mperrin closed this Mar 1, 2021
mperrin added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2021
add unit test for sign convention; adapted from notebook version in PR #418
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants