-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Come up with strategy for follow-up #16
Comments
What about resources for people to take projects forward? e.g. https://aws.amazon.com/grants/ is a quarterly grant scheme that gives credits to people that want to use cloud services, including for educating researchers in open data type cloud tools. |
Can we recognise contributors using a hatrack? See https://github.com/LABHR/hatrack |
@npscience can you turn this into an idea issue and give a pitch on it? |
This is now issue #49 - I can pitch it tomorrow. |
Daniel. Didnt know where else to put this. Following the discussion about providing academics/researchers with a simple way (e.g. infographic) of knowing which mechanisms (e.g. platforms, apps) might be in line with their Open Access (or other!) principles. Here is an example of a project trying to provide such assistance (with apps, and not specifically for academia): http://redecentralize.org/radar/ and the report from which it was inspired https://assets.thoughtworks.com/assets/technology-radar-nov-2016-en.pdf. This is slightly different to the issue of signposting changes in ownership of widely used free platforms, but still, this was the best I could do to answer my own question! |
|
For the people who attended to stay connected with each other and other people with similar interests, don't forget about the Open Research London Community Meet-up @OpenResLDN and similar perhaps to follow. There's nothing like bumping into someone face to face again and being able to catch up on and suggest developments to something you worked on once in the distant past ;) |
@JosephMcArthur add to the follow-up email a question like "What would you change in future events of this kind?" |
I think we could follow up on project's status's by just responding to tickets |
One follow-up not mentioned here yet is the |
Hey Daniel,
That's ace!
This site: https://github.com/sparcopen/doathon-dev which is going to be
formally launched soon (not quite yet done), may be very helpful! We've
done a lot of developing on the concept there, and the site is planned as a
potential template & approach for others moving forwards (post-OpenCon
2017).
J
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 15:00 Daniel Mietchen ***@***.***> wrote:
One follow-up not mentioned here yet is the
https://github.com/sparcopen/do-a-doathon
repo that came out of #47
<#47>, which is
now serving as the basis for a new event currently being set up at
https://github.com/UVA-DSI/2017-doathon .
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#16 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEuWZ1xVLwjG06HHqYAo9HPH-xV8GcBRks5suKdCgaJpZM4L_j50>
.
--
Joseph McArthur
Assistant Director: Right to Research Coalition
<http://righttoresearch.org/>
Co-Lead/Founder: Open Access Button <http://openaccessbutton.org/>
Twitter: @Mcarthur_Joe <https://twitter.com/Mcarthur_Joe>
Skype: joseph_mcarthur
|
OK, looks great except for the licensing, on which I just opened a ticket. Our event will be a few days post-OpenCon, so lots of potential for interaction. I'll also try to attend your doathon remotely. |
Follow-up in terms of
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: