Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Come up with strategy for follow-up #16

Open
Daniel-Mietchen opened this issue Feb 13, 2017 · 12 comments
Open

Come up with strategy for follow-up #16

Daniel-Mietchen opened this issue Feb 13, 2017 · 12 comments

Comments

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Collaborator

Follow-up in terms of

  • projects that were worked on at this event
  • people who attended the event
  • other events where some of the work from this event could be continued
  • potential contributions to Open Data Day 2018
@npscience
Copy link
Contributor

What about resources for people to take projects forward?

e.g. https://aws.amazon.com/grants/ is a quarterly grant scheme that gives credits to people that want to use cloud services, including for educating researchers in open data type cloud tools.

@npscience
Copy link
Contributor

Can we recognise contributors using a hatrack? See https://github.com/LABHR/hatrack

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@npscience can you turn this into an idea issue and give a pitch on it?

@npscience
Copy link
Contributor

This is now issue #49 - I can pitch it tomorrow.

@C21Beancounter
Copy link

Daniel. Didnt know where else to put this. Following the discussion about providing academics/researchers with a simple way (e.g. infographic) of knowing which mechanisms (e.g. platforms, apps) might be in line with their Open Access (or other!) principles.

Here is an example of a project trying to provide such assistance (with apps, and not specifically for academia): http://redecentralize.org/radar/ and the report from which it was inspired https://assets.thoughtworks.com/assets/technology-radar-nov-2016-en.pdf.

This is slightly different to the issue of signposting changes in ownership of widely used free platforms, but still, this was the best I could do to answer my own question!

@JosephMcArthur
Copy link
Member

  • Look at additional milestone
  • send email
  • let folks know that if they're going to do more work leave a note in the follow up email !

@goodwingibbins
Copy link

For the people who attended to stay connected with each other and other people with similar interests, don't forget about the Open Research London Community Meet-up @OpenResLDN and similar perhaps to follow. There's nothing like bumping into someone face to face again and being able to catch up on and suggest developments to something you worked on once in the distant past ;)

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@JosephMcArthur add to the follow-up email a question like "What would you change in future events of this kind?"

@JosephMcArthur JosephMcArthur self-assigned this May 4, 2017
@JosephMcArthur
Copy link
Member

I think we could follow up on project's status's by just responding to tickets

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

One follow-up not mentioned here yet is the
https://github.com/sparcopen/do-a-doathon
repo that came out of #47, which is now serving as the basis for a new event currently being set up at https://github.com/UVA-DSI/2017-doathon .

@JosephMcArthur
Copy link
Member

JosephMcArthur commented Oct 20, 2017 via email

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, looks great except for the licensing, on which I just opened a ticket. Our event will be a few days post-OpenCon, so lots of potential for interaction. I'll also try to attend your doathon remotely.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants