Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix PEP 695 output for classes in the LaTeX builder #12561

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

picnixz
Copy link
Member

@picnixz picnixz commented Jul 13, 2024

Related: #12543.

@jbms Can you try if the PR solves the first issue? (not the one where you inject additional type parameters).

Copy link
Member

@AA-Turner AA-Turner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor points:

CHANGES.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sphinx/domains/python/_annotations.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sphinx/writers/latex.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sphinx/writers/latex.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sphinx/writers/latex.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AA-Turner AA-Turner mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2024
picnixz and others added 2 commits July 14, 2024 03:28
# Conflicts:
#	CHANGES.rst
#	tests/test_builders/test_build_latex.py
@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title [LaTeX] fix PEP 695 output for classes Fix PEP 695 output for classes in the LaTeX builder Jul 15, 2024
@AA-Turner AA-Turner added this to the 7.4.0 milestone Jul 15, 2024
@AA-Turner AA-Turner merged commit 2a30bb6 into sphinx-doc:master Jul 15, 2024
21 checks passed
@picnixz picnixz deleted the fix-pep-695-latex branch July 15, 2024 06:58
jfbu added a commit to jfbu/sphinx that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 15, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants