Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Exceptions consistently #2353

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2019

Conversation

jrfnl
Copy link
Contributor

@jrfnl jrfnl commented Jan 7, 2019

Following up on bd961bb, a further review of the Exceptions being thrown showed some inconsistencies.

As far as I can see, Exceptions thrown by sniffs/utility methods when, for instance, a wrong token is passed, should be RuntimeExceptions, while Exceptions thrown by the Tokenizer classes should be TokenizerExceptions.

In a number of places this was applied inconsistently. This has now been fixed.

Aside from that, for quite a number of methods, the Exception being thrown has now been documented.

As far as I can see, Exceptions thrown by sniffs/utility methods when, for instance, a wrong token is passed, should be `RuntimeException`s, while Exceptions thrown by the `Tokenizer` classes should be `TokenizerException`s.

In a number of places this was applied inconsistently. This has now been fixed.

Aside from that, for quite a number of methods, the `Exception` being thrown has now been documented.
@jrfnl
Copy link
Contributor Author

jrfnl commented May 23, 2019

As discussed in #2189, this commit is included within #2456.

@gsherwood gsherwood merged commit 35b8bd7 into squizlabs:master Sep 9, 2019
@gsherwood
Copy link
Member

Thanks a lot for fixing these up.

@jrfnl jrfnl deleted the feature/exception-consistency branch September 9, 2019 03:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants