Feat: update pessimistic cost estimator to differentiate by contract sender

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -5,6 +5,13 @@ All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
 The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
 and this project adheres to the versioning scheme outlined in the [README.md](README.md).
 
+## [Unreleased]
+
+### Changed
+
+- The pessimistic execution cost estimator differentiates between
+  contracts with different origin addresses.
+
 ## [2.05.0.0.0]
 
 This software update is a consensus changing release and the

src/cost_estimates/pessimistic.rs

@@ -232,8 +232,8 @@ impl PessimisticEstimator {
                     StacksEpochId::Epoch2_05 => ":2.05",
                 };
                 format!(
-                    "cc{}:{}.{}",
-                    epoch_marker, cc.contract_name, cc.function_name
+                    "cc{}:{}:{}.{}",
+                    epoch_marker, cc.address, cc.contract_name, cc.function_name
                 )
             }
             TransactionPayload::SmartContract(_sc) => "contract-publish".to_string(),

src/cost_estimates/tests/cost_estimators.rs

@@ -282,6 +282,104 @@ fn test_pessimistic_cost_estimator_declining_average() {
     );
 }
 
+#[test]
+/// This tests the PessimisticEstimator as a unit (i.e., separate
+/// from the trait auto-impl method) by providing payload inputs
+/// to produce the expected pessimistic result (i.e., mean over a 10-sample
+/// window, where the window only updates if the new entry would make a dimension
+/// worse).
+fn pessimistic_estimator_contract_owner_separation() {
+    let mut estimator = instantiate_test_db();
+    let cc_payload_0 = TransactionPayload::ContractCall(TransactionContractCall {
+        address: StacksAddress::new(0, Hash160([0; 20])),
+        contract_name: "contract-1".into(),
+        function_name: "func1".into(),
+        function_args: vec![],
+    });
+    let cc_payload_1 = TransactionPayload::ContractCall(TransactionContractCall {
+        address: StacksAddress::new(0, Hash160([1; 20])),
+        contract_name: "contract-1".into(),
+        function_name: "func1".into(),
+        function_args: vec![],
+    });
+
+    estimator
+        .notify_event(
+            &cc_payload_0,
+            &ExecutionCost {
+                write_length: 1,
+                write_count: 1,
+                read_length: 1,
+                read_count: 1,
+                runtime: 1,
+            },
+            &BLOCK_LIMIT_MAINNET_20,
+            &StacksEpochId::Epoch20,
+        )
+        .expect("Should be able to process event");
+
+    assert_eq!(
+        estimator.estimate_cost(&cc_payload_1, &StacksEpochId::Epoch20,),
+        Err(EstimatorError::NoEstimateAvailable)
+    );
+
+    assert_eq!(
+        estimator
+            .estimate_cost(&cc_payload_0, &StacksEpochId::Epoch20,)
+            .expect("Should be able to provide cost estimate now"),
+        ExecutionCost {
+            write_length: 1,
+            write_count: 1,
+            read_length: 1,
+            read_count: 1,
+            runtime: 1,
+        }
+    );
+
+    estimator
+        .notify_event(
+            &cc_payload_1,
+            &ExecutionCost {
+                write_length: 5,
+                write_count: 5,
+                read_length: 5,
+                read_count: 5,
+                runtime: 5,
+            },
+            &BLOCK_LIMIT_MAINNET_20,
+            &StacksEpochId::Epoch20,
+        )
+        .expect("Should be able to process event");
+
+    // cc_payload_0 should not be affected
+    assert_eq!(
+        estimator
+            .estimate_cost(&cc_payload_0, &StacksEpochId::Epoch20,)
+            .expect("Should be able to provide cost estimate now"),
+        ExecutionCost {
+            write_length: 1,
+            write_count: 1,
+            read_length: 1,
+            read_count: 1,
+            runtime: 1,
+        }
+    );
+
+    // cc_payload_1 should be updated
+    assert_eq!(
+        estimator
+            .estimate_cost(&cc_payload_1, &StacksEpochId::Epoch20,)
+            .expect("Should be able to provide cost estimate now"),
+        ExecutionCost {
+            write_length: 5,
+            write_count: 5,
+            read_length: 5,
+            read_count: 5,
+            runtime: 5,
+        }
+    );
+}
+
 #[test]
 /// This tests the PessimisticEstimator as a unit (i.e., separate
 /// from the trait auto-impl method) by providing payload inputs