Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: move to a single-pull-request release process #544

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

travis
Copy link
Member

@travis travis commented Aug 28, 2023

The release process for this library is currently extremely cumbersome, requiring as many as 13 different release PRs merged in dependency order (with no CI-level enforcement and broken packages very possible) and a very slow build process. Even with relatively minor changes that affect half the packages I've spent an entire day half-distracted by running this process in the background.

This PR makes it so that all updated packages will be released at the same time. This is effectively what we do now, and there's very little downside to doing this (except perhaps a bit of extra churn on version numbers on packages that didn't strictly need to be released, but arguably we should be releasing any package number bumps immediately for good repo hygiene).

Open to not doing this, but opening to at the very least start the conversation.

The release process for this library is currently extremely cumbersome, requiring as many as 13 different release PRs merged in dependency order (with no CI-level enforcement and broken packages very possible) and a very slow build process. Even with relatively minor changes that affect half the packages I've spent an entire day half-distracted by running this process in the background.

This PR makes it so that all updated packages will be released at the same time. This is effectively what we do now, and there's very little downside to doing this (except perhaps a bit of extra churn on version numbers on packages that didn't strictly need to be released, but arguably we should be releasing any package number bumps immediately for good repo hygiene).

Open to not doing this, but opening to at the very least start the conversation.
alanshaw
alanshaw previously approved these changes Nov 28, 2023
Copy link
Member

@alanshaw alanshaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any different thoughts post #591 ? Personally I'd say yes lets do this.

Does it do the right thing with releasing core first etc.?

@alanshaw alanshaw dismissed their stale review November 28, 2023 10:46

Not sure of consequences for releasing packages in the correct order.

@travis
Copy link
Member Author

travis commented Nov 28, 2023

ah hm good question - I think it would set all of the version numbers and dependencies to the latest versions, so it shouldn't matter which order they're released in? but I could be missing some order-dependent thing...

@Peeja
Copy link
Member

Peeja commented Sep 3, 2024

…Yes, please? 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants