Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Yarn: Downgrade yarnpkg packages and support virtual files properly #23354

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2023

Conversation

valentinpalkovic
Copy link
Contributor

@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic commented Jul 7, 2023

Closes N/A

What I did

Downgraded yarnpkg packages to support Node >= 16. Also implemented proper Virtual File system handling in Windows and non Windows environments

How to test

  • not necessary. I have tested it on Windows/Non-Windows systems

Checklist

  • Make sure your changes are tested (stories and/or unit, integration, or end-to-end tests)
  • Make sure to add/update documentation regarding your changes
  • If you are deprecating/removing a feature, make sure to update
    MIGRATION.MD

Maintainers

  • If this PR should be tested against many or all sandboxes,
    make sure to add the ci:merged or ci:daily GH label to it.
  • Make sure this PR contains one of the labels below.

["cleanup", "BREAKING CHANGE", "feature request", "bug", "documentation", "maintenance", "dependencies", "other"]

@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic changed the title Downgrade yarnpkg packages and support virtual files properly Yarn: Downgrade yarnpkg packages and support virtual files properly Jul 7, 2023
@socket-security
Copy link

New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Packages Version New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
@yarnpkg/libzip 2.3.0 None +0 769 kB arcanis
@yarnpkg/fslib 2.10.3 None +2 1.82 MB arcanis

@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic merged commit 016ce7a into next Jul 7, 2023
@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic deleted the valentin/downgrade-yarnpkg-packages branch July 7, 2023 13:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants