Add new .generate_header method for webhooks
#916
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Adds a new `generate_header` method for the webhooks module, following up #915. This method doesn't help in any way with webhook verification, but may be useful to users in their test suites as it allows them to easily simulate the contents of a header that Stripe might have sent. We briefly discussed an alternative design here, but this one seems like the best fit: #915 (comment)
|
Merci! |
|
Released as 5.20.0. |
|
Nice, thanks ;) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a new
generate_headermethod for the webhooks module, followingup #915. This method doesn't help in any way with webhook verification,
but may be useful to users in their test suites as it allows them to
easily simulate the contents of a header that Stripe might have sent.
We briefly discussed an alternative design here, but this one seems like
the best fit:
#915 (comment)
r? @ob-stripe
cc @stripe/api-libraries