-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Unable to run executables due to missing DLL #406
Comments
I’ll try to get it running on my desktop this week to see what I can help to figure out. Offhand I don’t what could have gone amiss with your environment/the project on Windows, but almost certainly related to the dav1d requirements. I'd say double check that any path variables are still set and accessible in your shell and try a good ol' cargo clean as surface level tests to start debugging |
I think this could be related to the issue that I'm seeing with the Docker container:
Looks like just a lil oversight in the Dockerfile in #385?
|
Yes, definitely something wrong in the Dockerfile relating to the AVIF addition. Perhaps that feature should have gone to I'm currently eating lunch, I can try to mess around with the Dockerfile but my gut is telling me the
Did you run |
Yessir, I'll fiddle with it some more myself but you're probably right that it's a separate issue (possibly something related to Brendonovich/prisma-client-rust#195 but I'm not sure) In the meantime for |
In a roundabout way, this will be fixed by #409 |
@JMicheli I am going to close this out since I reverted the AVIF/dav1d work |
This is likely a windows-specific problem (possibly related to my build environment).
After pulling down the latest develop, I am unable to run the executables generated by the project, including codegen and the stump_server executables. For example:
The same error occurs when starting the dev server using
yarn dev:web
.Prior to this error, I had set up my environment to include the new dav1d dependency from #385 using vcpkg, and
dav1d-sys
was able to build correctly. I am wondering if the expected DLL might be related to this addition.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: