-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: Dynamic Stack Buffer Overflow #109
Merged
swhitty
merged 2 commits into
swhitty:main
from
chosa91:fix/dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow
Aug 5, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think the existing tests within SocketAddressTests already cover these same things?
testAddress_DecodesIP4()
testINET_ThrowsInvalidAddress_WhenFamilyIncorrect()
testAddress_DecodesIP6()
testINET6_ThrowsInvalidAddress_WhenFamilyIncorrect()
testUnix_IsCorrectlyDecodedFromStorage()
testUnix_ThrowsInvalidAddress_WhenFamilyIncorrect()
The existing
makeStorage()
is tested within the "decode" tests above. They are more of an encode/decode — they start with an address, callmakeStorage()
then convert back to the original address to assert the values are the same.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since they didn't run red, they should definitely be modified, if you think I'd better merge the tests. Since they run quite quickly, I thought it was no problem to validate the storage specific ones separately.
Tastes and slaps, I don't like overlapping test cases, however as our example shows, they can mask underlying-unit errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, if we go along with the current solution, I would like to note that I have worded the tests differently, if you like, I would be happy to reword them to the existing style (with underscores).