Recover from a bad merge #8
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2019
After creating a low-overhead loop, the loop update instruction was still
lingering around hurting performance. This removes dead loop update
instructions, which in our case are mostly SUBS instructions.
To support this, some helper functions were added to MachineLoopUtils and
ReachingDefAnalysis to analyse live-ins of loop exit blocks and find uses
before a particular loop instruction, respectively.
This is a first version that removes a SUBS instruction when there are no other
uses inside and outside the loop block, but there are some more interesting
cases in test/CodeGen/Thumb2/LowOverheadLoops/mve-tail-data-types.ll which
shows that there is room for improvement. For example, we can't handle this
case yet:
..
dlstp.32 lr, r2
.LBB0_1:
mov r3, r2
subs r2, #4
vldrh.u32 q2, [r1], #8
vmov q1, q0
vmla.u32 q0, q2, r0
letp lr, .LBB0_1
@ %bb.2:
vctp.32 r3
..
which is a lot more tricky because r2 is not only used by the subs, but also by
the mov to r3, which is used outside the low-overhead loop by the vctp
instruction, and that requires a bit of a different approach, and I will follow
up on this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71007
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2020
This reverts commit e57a9ab. Parser/cxx2a-placeholder-type-constraint.cpp has MSan failures. Present at 7b81c3f: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/builds/17133/steps/check-clang%20msan/logs/stdio not present at eaa594f: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/builds/17132/steps/check-clang%20msan/logs/stdio Stack trace: ``` ==57032==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0xccfe016 in clang::AutoTypeLoc::getLocalSourceRange() const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h:2036:19 #1 0xcc56758 in CheckDeducedPlaceholderConstraints(clang::Sema&, clang::AutoType const&, clang::AutoTypeLoc, clang::QualType) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4505:56 #2 0xcc550ce in clang::Sema::DeduceAutoType(clang::TypeLoc, clang::Expr*&, clang::QualType&, llvm::Optional<unsigned int>, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4707:11 #3 0xcc52407 in clang::Sema::DeduceAutoType(clang::TypeSourceInfo*, clang::Expr*&, clang::QualType&, llvm::Optional<unsigned int>, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4457:10 #4 0xba38332 in clang::Sema::deduceVarTypeFromInitializer(clang::VarDecl*, clang::DeclarationName, clang::QualType, clang::TypeSourceInfo*, clang::SourceRange, bool, clang::Expr*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11351:7 #5 0xba3a8a9 in clang::Sema::DeduceVariableDeclarationType(clang::VarDecl*, bool, clang::Expr*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11385:26 #6 0xba3c520 in clang::Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(clang::Decl*, clang::Expr*, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11725:9 #7 0xb39c498 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(clang::Declarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2399:17 #8 0xb394d80 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2128:21 #9 0xb383bbf in clang::Parser::ParseSimpleDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, bool, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:1848:10 #10 0xb383129 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h #11 0xb53a388 in clang::Parser::ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttributes(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 32u>&, clang::Parser::ParsedStmtContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:221:13 #12 0xb539309 in clang::Parser::ParseStatementOrDeclaration(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 32u>&, clang::Parser::ParsedStmtContext, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:106:20 #13 0xb55610e in clang::Parser::ParseCompoundStatementBody(bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:1079:11 #14 0xb559529 in clang::Parser::ParseFunctionStatementBody(clang::Decl*, clang::Parser::ParseScope&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:2204:21 #15 0xb33c13e in clang::Parser::ParseFunctionDefinition(clang::ParsingDeclarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::LateParsedAttrList*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1339:10 #16 0xb394703 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2068:11 #17 0xb338e52 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::AccessSpecifier) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1099:10 #18 0xb337674 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*, clang::AccessSpecifier) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1115:12 #19 0xb334a96 in clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:935:12 #20 0xb32f12a in clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:686:12 #21 0xb31e193 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:158:20 #22 0x80263f0 in clang::FrontendAction::Execute() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:936:8 #23 0x7f2a257 in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:965:33 #24 0x8288bef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:290:25 #25 0xad44c2 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:239:15 #26 0xacd76a in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:325:12 #27 0xacc9fd in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:398:12 #28 0x7f7d82cdb2e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #29 0xa4dde9 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/clang-11+0xa4dde9) ```
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2020
Summary:
Applying this cleanup:
- MIRBuilder.buildInstr(TargetOpcode::G_ASHR)
- .addDef(Shifted)
- .addUse(Res)
- .addUse(ShiftAmt);
+ MIRBuilder.buildAShr(Shifted, Res, ShiftAmt);
caused an assertion failure here:
llc: /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.cpp:404: llvm::MachineInstr *llvm::MachineRegisterInfo::getVRegDef(unsigned int) const: Assertion `(I.atEnd() || std::next(I) == def_instr_end()) && "getVRegDef assumes a single definition or no definition"' failed.
#4 0x00000000050a6d96 in llvm::MachineRegisterInfo::getVRegDef (this=0x74606a0, Reg=2147483650) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.cpp:403
#5 0x00000000066148f6 in llvm::getConstantVRegValWithLookThrough (VReg=2147483650, MRI=..., LookThroughInstrs=false, HandleFConstant=true) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.cpp:244
#6 0x00000000066147da in llvm::getConstantVRegVal (VReg=2147483650, MRI=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.cpp:210
#7 0x0000000006615367 in llvm::ConstantFoldBinOp (Opcode=101, Op1=2147483650, Op2=2147483656, MRI=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.cpp:341
#8 0x000000000657eee0 in llvm::CSEMIRBuilder::buildInstr (this=0x7465010, Opc=101, DstOps=..., SrcOps=..., Flag=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/CSEMIRBuilder.cpp:160
#9 0x0000000003645958 in llvm::MachineIRBuilder::buildAShr (this=0x7465010, Dst=..., Src0=..., Src1=..., Flags=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/MachineIRBuilder.h:1298
#10 0x00000000065c35b1 in llvm::LegalizerHelper::lower (this=0x7fffffffb5f8, MI=..., TypeIdx=0, Ty=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerHelper.cpp:2020
because at this point there are two instructions defining Res: the
original G_SMULO/G_UMULO and the new G_MUL that we built. The fix is
to modify the original mul in place, so that there is only ever one
definition of Res.
Reviewers: arsenm, aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: wdng, rovka, hiraditya, volkan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72842
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2020
This reverts commit dfecec6. Merging the change revealed that there is a failure on the memory sanitizer bots. Command Output (stderr): -- ==3569==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x1d71bff in llvm::AVRSubtarget::ParseSubtargetFeatures(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/lib/Target/AVR/AVRGenSubtargetInfo.inc:471:7 #1 0x1d721f8 in initializeSubtargetDependencies /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRSubtarget.cpp:50:3 #2 0x1d721f8 in llvm::AVRSubtarget::AVRSubtarget(llvm::Triple const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&, llvm::AVRTargetMachine const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRSubtarget.cpp:33:18 #3 0x1d3077f in llvm::AVRTargetMachine::AVRTargetMachine(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, llvm::Optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOpt::Level, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRTargetMachine.cpp:52:7 #4 0x1d3169d in llvm::RegisterTargetMachine<llvm::AVRTargetMachine>::Allocator(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, llvm::Optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOpt::Level, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:1121:16 #5 0x86662f in createTargetMachine /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:402:12 #6 0x86662f in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:473:52 #7 0x861f42 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:356:22 #8 0x7f76f7b072e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #9 0x7ebbc9 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc+0x7ebbc9) SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/lib/Target/AVR/AVRGenSubtargetInfo.inc:471:7 in llvm::AVRSubtarget::ParseSubtargetFeatures(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) Exiting FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. -- The patch wiill be re-committed once fixed.
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2020
…RecoveryExpr. Summary: crash stack: ``` lang: workspace/llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:13704: bool EvaluateInPlace(clang::APValue &, (anonymous namespace)::EvalInfo &, const (anonymous namespace)::LValue &, const clang::Expr *, bool): Assertion `!E->isValueDependent()' failed. #8 EvaluateInPlace(clang::APValue&, (anonymous namespace)::EvalInfo&, (anonymous namespace)::LValue const&, clang::Expr const*, bool) workspace/llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:0:0 #9 HandleConstructorCall(clang::Expr const*, (anonymous namespace)::LValue const&, clang::APValue*, clang::CXXConstructorDecl const*, (anonymous namespace)::EvalInfo&, clang::APValue&) workspace/llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:5779:57 #10 HandleConstructorCall(clang::Expr const*, (anonymous namespace)::LValue const&, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Expr const*>, clang::CXXConstructorDecl const*, (anonymous namespace)::EvalInfo&, clang::APValue&) workspace/llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:5819:10 #11 clang::Expr::isPotentialConstantExpr(clang::FunctionDecl const*, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<clang::SourceLocation, clang::PartialDiagnostic> >&) workspace/llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:14746:5 #12 CheckConstexprFunctionBody(clang::Sema&, clang::FunctionDecl const*, clang::Stmt*, clang::Sema::CheckConstexprKind) workspace/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:2306:7 #13 clang::Sema::CheckConstexprFunctionDefinition(clang::FunctionDecl const*, clang::Sema::CheckConstexprKind) workspace/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:1766:0 #14 clang::Sema::ActOnFinishFunctionBody(clang::Decl*, clang::Stmt*, bool) workspace/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14357:9 #15 clang::Parser::ParseFunctionStatementBody(clang::Decl*, clang::Parser::ParseScope&) workspace/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:2213:18 ``` Reviewers: sammccall Reviewed By: sammccall Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77041
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2020
Summary: crash stack: ``` lang: tools/clang/include/clang/AST/AttrImpl.inc:1490: unsigned int clang::AlignedAttr::getAlignment(clang::ASTContext &) const: Assertion `!isAlignmentDependent()' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: ./bin/clang -cc1 -std=c++1y -ast-dump -frecovery-ast -fcxx-exceptions /tmp/t4.cpp 1. /tmp/t4.cpp:3:31: current parser token ';' #0 0x0000000002530cff llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:564:13 #1 0x000000000252ee30 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18 #2 0x000000000253126c SignalHandler(int) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:396:3 #3 0x00007f86964d0520 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x13520) #4 0x00007f8695f9ff61 raise /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1 #5 0x00007f8695f8b535 abort /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #6 0x00007f8695f8b40f _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/intl/loadmsgcat.c:1177:9 #7 0x00007f8695f98b92 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32b92) #8 0x0000000004503d9f llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1623:5 #9 0x0000000004503d9f clang::AlignedAttr::getAlignment(clang::ASTContext&) const llvm-project/build/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/AttrImpl.inc:1492:0 ``` Reviewers: sammccall Subscribers: cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78085
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2020
Bitcode file alignment is only 32-bit so 64-bit offsets need
special handling.
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6327:28: runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x7fca2bcfe54c for type 'const uint64_t' (aka 'const unsigned long'), which requires 8 byte alignment
0x7fca2bcfe54c: note: pointer points here
00 00 00 00 5a a6 01 00 00 00 00 00 19 a7 01 00 00 00 00 00 48 a7 01 00 00 00 00 00 7d a7 01 00
^
#0 0x3be2fe4 in clang::ASTReader::TypeCursorForIndex(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6327:28
#1 0x3be30a0 in clang::ASTReader::readTypeRecord(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6348:24
#2 0x3bd3d4a in clang::ASTReader::GetType(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6985:26
#3 0x3c5d9ae in clang::ASTDeclReader::Visit(clang::Decl*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:533:31
#4 0x3c91cac in clang::ASTReader::ReadDeclRecord(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:4045:10
#5 0x3bd4fb1 in clang::ASTReader::GetDecl(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:7352:5
#6 0x3bce2f9 in clang::ASTReader::ReadASTBlock(clang::serialization::ModuleFile&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:3625:22
#7 0x3bd6d75 in clang::ASTReader::ReadAST(llvm::StringRef, clang::serialization::ModuleKind, clang::SourceLocation, unsigned int, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::ASTReader::ImportedSubmodule>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:4230:32
#8 0x3a6b415 in clang::CompilerInstance::createPCHExternalASTSource(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, bool, bool, clang::Preprocessor&, clang::InMemoryModuleCache&, clang::ASTContext&, clang::PCHContainerReader const&, llvm::ArrayRef<std::shared_ptr<clang::ModuleFileExtension> >, llvm::ArrayRef<std::shared_ptr<clang::DependencyCollector> >, void*, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:539:19
#9 0x3a6b00e in clang::CompilerInstance::createPCHExternalASTSource(llvm::StringRef, bool, bool, void*, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:501:18
#10 0x3abac80 in clang::FrontendAction::BeginSourceFile(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::FrontendInputFile const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:865:12
#11 0x3a6e61c in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:972:13
#12 0x3ba74bf in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:282:25
#13 0xa3f753 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:240:15
#14 0xa3a68a in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:330:12
#15 0xa37f31 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:407:12
#16 0x7fca2a7032e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
#17 0xa21029 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang-11+0xa21029)
This reverts commit 30d5946.
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2020
This adds some extra processing into the Pre-RA ARM load/store optimizer to detect and merge MVE loads/stores and adds of the same base. This we don't always turn into a post-inc during ISel, and due to the nature of it being a graph we don't always know an order to use for the nodes, not knowing which nodes to make post-inc and which to use the new post-inc of. After ISel, we have an order that we can use to post-inc the following instructions. So this looks for a loads/store with a starting offset of 0, and an add/sub from the same base, plus a number of other loads/stores. We then do some checks and convert the zero offset load/store into a postinc variant. Any loads/stores after it have the offset subtracted from their immediates. For example: LDR #4 LDR #4 LDR #0 LDR_POSTINC #16 LDR #8 LDR #-8 LDR #12 LDR #-4 ADD #16 It only handles MVE loads/stores at the moment. Normal loads/store will be added in a followup patch, they just have some extra details to ensure that we keep generating LDRD/LDM successfully. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77813
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2020
Summary:
The previous code tries to strip out parentheses and anything in between
them. I'm guessing the idea here was to try to drop any listed arguments
for the function being symbolized. Unfortunately this approach is broken
in several ways.
* Templated functions may contain parentheses. The existing approach
messes up these names.
* In C++ argument types are part of a function's signature for the
purposes of overloading so removing them could be confusing.
Fix this simply by not trying to adjust the function name that comes
from `atos`.
A test case is included.
Without the change the test case produced output like:
```
WRITE of size 4 at 0x6060000001a0 thread T0
#0 0x10b96614d in IntWrapper<void >::operator=> const&) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:10
#1 0x10b960b0e in void writeToA<IntWrapper<void > >>) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:30
#2 0x10b96bf27 in decltype>)>> >)) std::__1::__invoke<void >), IntWrapper<void > >>), IntWrapper<void >&&) type_traits:4425
#3 0x10b96bdc1 in void std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<void>::__call<void >), IntWrapper<void > >>), IntWrapper<void >&&) __functional_base:348
#4 0x10b96bd71 in std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<void >), std::__1::allocator<void >)>, void >)>::operator>&&) functional:1533
#5 0x10b9684e2 in std::__1::__function::__func<void >), std::__1::allocator<void >)>, void >)>::operator>&&) functional:1707
#6 0x10b96cd7b in std::__1::__function::__value_func<void >)>::operator>&&) const functional:1860
#7 0x10b96cc17 in std::__1::function<void >)>::operator>) const functional:2419
#8 0x10b960ca6 in Foo<void >), IntWrapper<void > >::doCall>) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:44
#9 0x10b96088b in main asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:54
#10 0x7fff6ffdfcc8 in start (in libdyld.dylib) + 0
```
Note how the symbol names for the frames are messed up (e.g. #8, #1).
With the patch the output looks like:
```
WRITE of size 4 at 0x6060000001a0 thread T0
#0 0x10005214d in IntWrapper<void (int)>::operator=(IntWrapper<void (int)> const&) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:10
#1 0x10004cb0e in void writeToA<IntWrapper<void (int)> >(IntWrapper<void (int)>) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:30
#2 0x100057f27 in decltype(std::__1::forward<void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>)>(fp)(std::__1::forward<IntWrapper<void (int)> >(fp0))) std::__1::__invoke<void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)> >(void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) type_traits:4425
#3 0x100057dc1 in void std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<void>::__call<void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)> >(void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) __functional_base:348
#4 0x100057d71 in std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<void (*)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), std::__1::allocator<void (*)(IntWrapper<void (int)>)>, void (IntWrapper<void (int)>)>::operator()(IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) functional:1533
#5 0x1000544e2 in std::__1::__function::__func<void (*)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), std::__1::allocator<void (*)(IntWrapper<void (int)>)>, void (IntWrapper<void (int)>)>::operator()(IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) functional:1707
#6 0x100058d7b in std::__1::__function::__value_func<void (IntWrapper<void (int)>)>::operator()(IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) const functional:1860
#7 0x100058c17 in std::__1::function<void (IntWrapper<void (int)>)>::operator()(IntWrapper<void (int)>) const functional:2419
#8 0x10004cca6 in Foo<void (IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)> >::doCall(IntWrapper<void (int)>) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:44
#9 0x10004c88b in main asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:54
#10 0x7fff6ffdfcc8 in start (in libdyld.dylib) + 0
```
rdar://problem/58887175
Reviewers: kubamracek, yln
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79597
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2020
Summary: crash stack: ``` llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:2248: clang::TypeInfo clang::ASTContext::getTypeInfoImpl(const clang::Type *) const: Assertion `!A->getDeducedType().isNull() && "cannot request the size of an undeduced or dependent auto type"' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: #0 0x00000000025bb0bf llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:564:13 #1 0x00000000025b92b0 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18 #2 0x00000000025bb535 SignalHandler(int) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:396:3 #3 0x00007f9ef9298110 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14110) #4 0x00007f9ef8d72761 raise /build/glibc-M65Gwz/glibc-2.30/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1 #5 0x00007f9ef8d5c55b abort /build/glibc-M65Gwz/glibc-2.30/stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #6 0x00007f9ef8d5c42f get_sysdep_segment_value /build/glibc-M65Gwz/glibc-2.30/intl/loadmsgcat.c:509:8 #7 0x00007f9ef8d5c42f _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-M65Gwz/glibc-2.30/intl/loadmsgcat.c:970:34 #8 0x00007f9ef8d6b092 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x34092) #9 0x000000000458abe0 clang::ASTContext::getTypeInfoImpl(clang::Type const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:0:5 ``` Reviewers: sammccall Subscribers: cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81384
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2020
When `Target::GetEntryPointAddress()` calls `exe_module->GetObjectFile()->GetEntryPointAddress()`, and the returned `entry_addr` is valid, it can immediately be returned. However, just before that, an `llvm::Error` value has been setup, but in this case it is not consumed before returning, like is done further below in the function. In https://bugs.freebsd.org/248745 we got a bug report for this, where a very simple test case aborts and dumps core: ``` * thread #1, name = 'testcase', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x00000000002018d4 testcase`main(argc=1, argv=0x00007fffffffea18) at testcase.c:3:5 1 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) 2 { -> 3 return 0; 4 } (lldb) p argc Program aborted due to an unhandled Error: Error value was Success. (Note: Success values must still be checked prior to being destroyed). Thread 1 received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3 3 thr_kill.S: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3 #1 0x00000008049a0004 in __raise (s=6) at /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/raise.c:52 #2 0x0000000804916229 in abort () at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:67 #3 0x000000000451b5f5 in fatalUncheckedError () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Error.cpp:112 #4 0x00000000019cf008 in GetEntryPointAddress () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h:267 #5 0x0000000001bccbd8 in ConstructorSetup () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:67 #6 0x0000000001bcd2c0 in ThreadPlanCallFunction () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:114 #7 0x00000000020076d4 in InferiorCallMmap () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/InferiorCallPOSIX.cpp:97 #8 0x0000000001f4be33 in DoAllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp:604 #9 0x0000000001fe51b9 in AllocatePage () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:347 #10 0x0000000001fe5385 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:383 #11 0x0000000001974da2 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2301 #12 CanJIT () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2331 #13 0x0000000001a1bf3d in Evaluate () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/UserExpression.cpp:190 #14 0x00000000019ce7a2 in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp:2372 #15 0x0000000001ad784c in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:414 #16 0x0000000001ad86ae in DoExecute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:646 #17 0x0000000001a5e3ed in Execute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandObject.cpp:1003 #18 0x0000000001a6c4a3 in HandleCommand () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1762 #19 0x0000000001a6f98c in IOHandlerInputComplete () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2760 #20 0x0000000001a90b08 in Run () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:548 #21 0x00000000019a6c6a in ExecuteIOHandlers () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/Debugger.cpp:903 #22 0x0000000001a70337 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2946 #23 0x0000000001d9d812 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/API/SBDebugger.cpp:1169 #24 0x0000000001918be8 in MainLoop () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:675 #25 0x000000000191a114 in main () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:890``` Fix the incorrect error catch by only instantiating an `Error` object if it is necessary. Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86355
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2020
When `Target::GetEntryPointAddress()` calls `exe_module->GetObjectFile()->GetEntryPointAddress()`, and the returned `entry_addr` is valid, it can immediately be returned. However, just before that, an `llvm::Error` value has been setup, but in this case it is not consumed before returning, like is done further below in the function. In https://bugs.freebsd.org/248745 we got a bug report for this, where a very simple test case aborts and dumps core: ``` * thread #1, name = 'testcase', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x00000000002018d4 testcase`main(argc=1, argv=0x00007fffffffea18) at testcase.c:3:5 1 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) 2 { -> 3 return 0; 4 } (lldb) p argc Program aborted due to an unhandled Error: Error value was Success. (Note: Success values must still be checked prior to being destroyed). Thread 1 received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3 3 thr_kill.S: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3 #1 0x00000008049a0004 in __raise (s=6) at /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/raise.c:52 #2 0x0000000804916229 in abort () at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:67 #3 0x000000000451b5f5 in fatalUncheckedError () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Error.cpp:112 #4 0x00000000019cf008 in GetEntryPointAddress () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h:267 #5 0x0000000001bccbd8 in ConstructorSetup () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:67 #6 0x0000000001bcd2c0 in ThreadPlanCallFunction () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:114 #7 0x00000000020076d4 in InferiorCallMmap () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/InferiorCallPOSIX.cpp:97 #8 0x0000000001f4be33 in DoAllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp:604 #9 0x0000000001fe51b9 in AllocatePage () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:347 #10 0x0000000001fe5385 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:383 #11 0x0000000001974da2 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2301 #12 CanJIT () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2331 #13 0x0000000001a1bf3d in Evaluate () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/UserExpression.cpp:190 #14 0x00000000019ce7a2 in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp:2372 #15 0x0000000001ad784c in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:414 #16 0x0000000001ad86ae in DoExecute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:646 #17 0x0000000001a5e3ed in Execute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandObject.cpp:1003 #18 0x0000000001a6c4a3 in HandleCommand () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1762 #19 0x0000000001a6f98c in IOHandlerInputComplete () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2760 #20 0x0000000001a90b08 in Run () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:548 #21 0x00000000019a6c6a in ExecuteIOHandlers () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/Debugger.cpp:903 #22 0x0000000001a70337 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2946 #23 0x0000000001d9d812 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/API/SBDebugger.cpp:1169 #24 0x0000000001918be8 in MainLoop () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:675 #25 0x000000000191a114 in main () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:890``` Fix the incorrect error catch by only instantiating an `Error` object if it is necessary. Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86355 (cherry picked from commit 1ce07cd)
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2020
A couple of AArch64 tests were failing on Solaris, both sparc and x86: LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/add-diagnostics.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/cpy-diagnostics.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/cpy.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/dup-diagnostics.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/dup.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/mov-diagnostics.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/mov.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/sqadd-diagnostics.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/sqsub-diagnostics.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/sub-diagnostics.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/subr-diagnostics.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/uqadd-diagnostics.s LLVM :: MC/AArch64/SVE/uqsub-diagnostics.s For example, reduced from `MC/AArch64/SVE/add-diagnostics.s`: add z0.b, z0.b, #0, lsl #8 missed the expected diagnostics $ ./bin/llvm-mc -triple=aarch64 -show-encoding -mattr=+sve add.s add.s:1:21: error: immediate must be an integer in range [0, 255] with a shift amount of 0 add z0.b, z0.b, #0, lsl #8 ^ The message is `Match_InvalidSVEAddSubImm8`, emitted in the generated `lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64GenAsmMatcher.inc` for `MCK_SVEAddSubImm8`. When comparing the call to `::AArch64Operand::isSVEAddSubImm<char>` on both Linux/x86_64 and Solaris, I find 875 bool IsByte = std::is_same<int8_t, std::make_signed_t<T>>::value; is `false` on Solaris, unlike Linux. The problem boils down to the fact that `int8_t` is plain `char` on Solaris: both the sparc and i386 psABIs have `char` as signed. However, with 9887 DiagnosticPredicate DP(Operand.isSVEAddSubImm<int8_t>()); in `lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64GenAsmMatcher.inc`, `std::make_signed_t<int8_t>` above yieds `signed char`, so `std::is_same<int8_t, signed char>` is `false`. This can easily be fixed by also allowing for `int8_t` here and in a few similar places. Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`, `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`, and `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85225
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2020
ADDI often has a frameindex in operand 1, but consumers of this interface, such as MachineSink, tend to call getReg() on the Destination and Source operands, leading to the following crash when building FreeBSD after this implementation was added in 8cf6778: ``` clang: llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h:359: llvm::Register llvm::MachineOperand::getReg() const: Assertion `isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: #0 0x00007f4286f9b4d0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:563:0 #1 0x00007f4286f9b587 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:630:0 #2 0x00007f4286f9926b llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:71:0 #3 0x00007f4286f9ae52 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:405:0 #4 0x00007f428646ffd0 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3efd0) #5 0x00007f428646ff47 raise /build/glibc-2ORdQG/glibc-2.27/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:0 #6 0x00007f42864718b1 abort /build/glibc-2ORdQG/glibc-2.27/stdlib/abort.c:81:0 #7 0x00007f428646142a __assert_fail_base /build/glibc-2ORdQG/glibc-2.27/assert/assert.c:89:0 #8 0x00007f42864614a2 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x304a2) #9 0x00007f428d4078e2 llvm::MachineOperand::getReg() const llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h:359:0 #10 0x00007f428d8260e7 attemptDebugCopyProp(llvm::MachineInstr&, llvm::MachineInstr&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:862:0 #11 0x00007f428d826442 performSink(llvm::MachineInstr&, llvm::MachineBasicBlock&, llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineInstr*>&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:918:0 #12 0x00007f428d826e27 (anonymous namespace)::MachineSinking::SinkInstruction(llvm::MachineInstr&, bool&, std::map<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, 4u>, std::less<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::MachineBasicBlock* const, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, 4u> > > >&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:1073:0 #13 0x00007f428d824a2c (anonymous namespace)::MachineSinking::ProcessBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:410:0 #14 0x00007f428d824513 (anonymous namespace)::MachineSinking::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:340:0 ``` Thus, check that operand 1 is also a register in the condition. Reviewed By: arichardson, luismarques Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89090
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2020
CXXDeductionGuideDecl with a local typedef has its own copy of the
TypedefDecl with the CXXDeductionGuideDecl as the DeclContext of that
TypedefDecl.
```
template <typename T> struct A {
typedef T U;
A(U, T);
};
A a{(int)0, (int)0};
```
Related discussion on cfe-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-November/067252.html
Without this fix, when we import the CXXDeductionGuideDecl (via
VisitFunctionDecl) then before creating the Decl we must import the
FunctionType. However, the first parameter's type is the afore mentioned
local typedef. So, we then start importing the TypedefDecl whose
DeclContext is the CXXDeductionGuideDecl itself. The infinite loop is
formed.
```
#0 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCXXDeductionGuideDecl(clang::CXXDeductionGuideDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3543:0
#1 clang::declvisitor::Base<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Decl*> >::Visit(clang::Decl*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclNodes.inc:405:0
#2 clang::ASTImporter::ImportImpl(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8038:0
#3 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8200:0
#4 clang::ASTImporter::ImportContext(clang::DeclContext*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8297:0
#5 clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportDeclContext(clang::Decl*, clang::DeclContext*&, clang::DeclContext*&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1852:0
#6 clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportDeclParts(clang::NamedDecl*, clang::DeclContext*&, clang::DeclContext*&, clang::DeclarationName&, clang::NamedDecl*&, clang::SourceLocation&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1628:0
#7 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitTypedefNameDecl(clang::TypedefNameDecl*, bool) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:2419:0
#8 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitTypedefDecl(clang::TypedefDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:2500:0
#9 clang::declvisitor::Base<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Decl*> >::Visit(clang::Decl*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclNodes.inc:315:0
#10 clang::ASTImporter::ImportImpl(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8038:0
#11 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8200:0
#12 llvm::Expected<clang::TypedefNameDecl*> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::TypedefNameDecl>(clang::TypedefNameDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:165:0
#13 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitTypedefType(clang::TypedefType const*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1304:0
#14 clang::TypeVisitor<clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> >::Visit(clang::Type const*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc:74:0
#15 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::QualType) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8071:0
#16 llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::QualType>(clang::QualType const&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:179:0
#17 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitFunctionProtoType(clang::FunctionProtoType const*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1244:0
#18 clang::TypeVisitor<clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> >::Visit(clang::Type const*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc:47:0
#19 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::QualType) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8071:0
#20 llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::QualType>(clang::QualType const&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:179:0
#21 clang::QualType clang::ASTNodeImporter::importChecked<clang::QualType>(llvm::Error&, clang::QualType const&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:198:0
#22 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitFunctionDecl(clang::FunctionDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3313:0
#23 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCXXDeductionGuideDecl(clang::CXXDeductionGuideDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3543:0
```
The fix is to first create the TypedefDecl and only then start to import
the DeclContext.
Basically, we could do this during the import of all other Decls (not
just for typedefs). But it seems, there is only one another AST
construct that has a similar cycle: a struct defined as a function
parameter:
```
int struct_in_proto(struct data_t{int a;int b;} *d);
```
In that case, however, we had decided to return simply with an error
back then because that seemed to be a very rare construct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92209
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2021
…tion attribute id changes When introducing support for @llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl, this tests started failing because it checks (for no good reason) for a function attribute id of '#8' which now becomes '#9' Reviewed By: pratlucas Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94233
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2021
Andrei Matei reported a llvm11 core dump for his bpf program https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48578 The core dump happens in LiveVariables analysis phase. #4 0x00007fce54356bb0 __restore_rt #5 0x00007fce4d51785e llvm::LiveVariables::HandleVirtRegUse(unsigned int, llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::MachineInstr&) #6 0x00007fce4d519abe llvm::LiveVariables::runOnInstr(llvm::MachineInstr&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned int>&) #7 0x00007fce4d519ec6 llvm::LiveVariables::runOnBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, unsigned int) #8 0x00007fce4d51a4bf llvm::LiveVariables::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) The bug can be reproduced with llvm12 and latest trunk as well. Futher analysis shows that there is a bug in BPF peephole TRUNC elimination optimization, which tries to remove unnecessary TRUNC operations (a <<= 32; a >>= 32). Specifically, the compiler did wrong transformation for the following patterns: %1 = LDW ... %2 = SLL_ri %1, 32 %3 = SRL_ri %2, 32 ... %3 ... %4 = SRA_ri %2, 32 ... %4 ... The current transformation did not check how many uses of %2 and did transformation like %1 = LDW ... ... %1 ... %4 = SRL_ri %2, 32 ... %4 ... and pseudo register %2 is used by not defined and caused LiveVariables analysis core dump. To fix the issue, when traversing back from SRL_ri to SLL_ri, check to ensure SLL_ri has only one use. Otherwise, don't do transformation. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97792
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2021
…rtial type llvm-dwarfdump crashed for Unit header with DW_UT_partial type. ------------- llvm-dwarfdump: /tmp/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h:197: T& llvm::optional_detail::OptionalStorage<T, true>::getValue() & [with T = long unsigned int]: Assertion `hasVal' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to the technical support section of https://developer.amd.com/amd-aocc and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: llvm-dwarfdump -v /tmp/test/DebugInfo/X86/Output/dwarfdump-he ader.s.tmp.o #0 0x00007f37d5ad8838 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /tmp/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:565:0 #1 0x00007f37d5ad88ef PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /tmp/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:632:0 #2 0x00007f37d5ad65bd llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /tmp/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:71:0 #3 0x00007f37d5ad81b9 SignalHandler(int) /tmp/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:407:0 #4 0x00007f37d4c26040 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3f040) #5 0x00007f37d4c25fb7 raise /build/glibc-S9d2JN/glibc-2.27/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:0 #6 0x00007f37d4c27921 abort /build/glibc-S9d2JN/glibc-2.27/stdlib/abort.c:81:0 #7 0x00007f37d4c1748a __assert_fail_base /build/glibc-S9d2JN/glibc-2.27/assert/assert.c:89:0 #8 0x00007f37d4c17502 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x30502) #9 0x00007f37d7576b81 llvm::optional_detail::OptionalStorage<unsigned long, true>::getValue() & /tmp/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h:198:0 #10 0x00007f37d75726ac llvm::Optional<unsigned long>::operator*() && /tmp/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h:309:0 #11 0x00007f37d7582968 llvm::DWARFCompileUnit::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::DIDumpOptions) /tmp/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFCompileUnit.cpp:30:0 -------------- Patch by: @jini.susan Reviewed By: @probinson Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101255
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2021
Andrei Matei reported a llvm11 core dump for his bpf program https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48578 The core dump happens in LiveVariables analysis phase. #4 0x00007fce54356bb0 __restore_rt #5 0x00007fce4d51785e llvm::LiveVariables::HandleVirtRegUse(unsigned int, llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::MachineInstr&) #6 0x00007fce4d519abe llvm::LiveVariables::runOnInstr(llvm::MachineInstr&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned int>&) #7 0x00007fce4d519ec6 llvm::LiveVariables::runOnBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, unsigned int) #8 0x00007fce4d51a4bf llvm::LiveVariables::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) The bug can be reproduced with llvm12 and latest trunk as well. Futher analysis shows that there is a bug in BPF peephole TRUNC elimination optimization, which tries to remove unnecessary TRUNC operations (a <<= 32; a >>= 32). Specifically, the compiler did wrong transformation for the following patterns: %1 = LDW ... %2 = SLL_ri %1, 32 %3 = SRL_ri %2, 32 ... %3 ... %4 = SRA_ri %2, 32 ... %4 ... The current transformation did not check how many uses of %2 and did transformation like %1 = LDW ... ... %1 ... %4 = SRL_ri %2, 32 ... %4 ... and pseudo register %2 is used by not defined and caused LiveVariables analysis core dump. To fix the issue, when traversing back from SRL_ri to SLL_ri, check to ensure SLL_ri has only one use. Otherwise, don't do transformation. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97792 (cherry picked from commit 51cdb78)
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2021
This patch fixes an issue where a pre-indexed store e.g., STR x1, [x0, #24]! with a store like STR x0, [x0, #8] are merged into a single store: STP x1, x0, [x0, #24]! . They shouldn’t be merged because the second store uses x0 as both the stored value and the address and so it needs to be using the updated x0. Therefore, it should not be folded into a STP <>pre. Additionally a new test case is added to verify this fix. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101888 Change-Id: I26f1985ac84e970961e2cdca23c590fa6773851a
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2021
…ing it Having nested macros in the C code could cause clangd to fail an assert in clang::Preprocessor::setLoadedMacroDirective() and crash. #1 0x00000000007ace30 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /qdelacru/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:632:1 #2 0x00000000007aaded llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /qdelacru/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:76:20 #3 0x00000000007ac7c1 SignalHandler(int) /qdelacru/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:407:1 #4 0x00007f096604db20 __restore_rt (/lib64/libpthread.so.0+0x12b20) #5 0x00007f0964b307ff raise (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x377ff) #6 0x00007f0964b1ac35 abort (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21c35) #7 0x00007f0964b1ab09 _nl_load_domain.cold.0 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21b09) #8 0x00007f0964b28de6 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2fde6) #9 0x0000000001004d1a clang::Preprocessor::setLoadedMacroDirective(clang::IdentifierInfo*, clang::MacroDirective*, clang::MacroDirective*) /qdelacru/llvm-project/clang/lib/Lex/PPMacroExpansion.cpp:116:5 An example of the code that causes the assert failure: ``` ... ``` During code completion in clangd, the macros will be loaded in loadMainFilePreambleMacros() by iterating over the macro names and calling PreambleIdentifiers->get(). Since these macro names are store in a StringSet (has StringMap underlying container), the order of the iterator is not guaranteed to be same as the order seen in the source code. When clangd is trying to resolve nested macros it sometimes attempts to load them out of order which causes a macro to be stored twice. In the example above, ECHO2 macro gets resolved first, but since it uses another macro that has not been resolved it will try to resolve/store that as well. Now there are two MacroDirectives stored in the Preprocessor, ECHO and ECHO2. When clangd tries to load the next macro, ECHO, the preprocessor fails an assert in clang::Preprocessor::setLoadedMacroDirective() because there is already a MacroDirective stored for that macro name. In this diff, I check if the macro is already inside the IdentifierTable and if it is skip it so that it is not resolved twice. Reviewed By: kadircet Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101870
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2021
This fixes a GISEL vs SDAG regression that showed up at -Os in 256.bzip2 In `_getAndMoveToFrontDecode`: gisel: ``` and w9, w0, #0xff orr w9, w9, w8, lsl #8 ``` sdag: ``` bfi w0, w8, #8, #24 ``` Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103291
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2021
Rust's v0 name mangling scheme [1] is easy to disambiguate from other
name mangling schemes because symbols always start with `_R`. The llvm
Demangle library supports demangling the Rust v0 scheme. Use it to
demangle Rust symbols.
Added unit tests that check simple symbols. Ran LLDB built with this
patch to debug some Rust programs compiled with the v0 name mangling
scheme. Confirmed symbol names were demangled as expected.
Note: enabling the new name mangling scheme requires a nightly
toolchain:
```
$ cat main.rs
fn main() {
println!("Hello world!");
}
$ $(rustup which --toolchain nightly rustc) -Z symbol-mangling-version=v0 main.rs -g
$ /home/asm/hacking/llvm/build/bin/lldb ./main --one-line 'b main.rs:2'
(lldb) target create "./main"
Current executable set to '/home/asm/hacking/llvm/rust/main' (x86_64).
(lldb) b main.rs:2
Breakpoint 1: where = main`main::main + 4 at main.rs:2:5, address = 0x00000000000076a4
(lldb) r
Process 948449 launched: '/home/asm/hacking/llvm/rust/main' (x86_64)
warning: (x86_64) /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 No LZMA support found for reading .gnu_debugdata section
Process 948449 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'main', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
frame #0: 0x000055555555b6a4 main`main::main at main.rs:2:5
1 fn main() {
-> 2 println!("Hello world!");
3 }
(lldb) bt
error: need to add support for DW_TAG_base_type '()' encoded with DW_ATE = 0x7, bit_size = 0
* thread #1, name = 'main', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
* frame #0: 0x000055555555b6a4 main`main::main at main.rs:2:5
frame #1: 0x000055555555b78b main`<fn() as core::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once((null)=(main`main::main at main.rs:1), (null)=<unavailable>) at function.rs:227:5
frame #2: 0x000055555555b66e main`std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<fn(), ()>(f=(main`main::main at main.rs:1)) at backtrace.rs:125:18
frame #3: 0x000055555555b851 main`std::rt::lang_start::<()>::{closure#0} at rt.rs:49:18
frame #4: 0x000055555556c9f9 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a [inlined] core::ops::function::impls::_$LT$impl$u20$core..ops..function..FnOnce$LT$A$GT$$u20$for$u20$$RF$F$GT$::call_once::h04259e4a34d07c2f at function.rs:259:13
frame #5: 0x000055555556c9f2 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a [inlined] std::panicking::try::do_call::hb8da45704d5cfbbf at panicking.rs:401:40
frame #6: 0x000055555556c9f2 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a [inlined] std::panicking::try::h4beadc19a78fec52 at panicking.rs:365:19
frame #7: 0x000055555556c9f2 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a [inlined] std::panic::catch_unwind::hc58016cd36ba81a4 at panic.rs:433:14
frame #8: 0x000055555556c9f2 main`std::rt::lang_start_internal::hc51399759a90501a at rt.rs:34:21
frame #9: 0x000055555555b830 main`std::rt::lang_start::<()>(main=(main`main::main at main.rs:1), argc=1, argv=0x00007fffffffcb18) at rt.rs:48:5
frame #10: 0x000055555555b6fc main`main + 28
frame #11: 0x00007ffff73f2493 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 243
frame #12: 0x000055555555b59e main`_start + 46
(lldb)
```
[1]: rust-lang/rust#60705
Reviewed By: clayborg, teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2021
There is a SIGSEGV at `DeduceTemplateArgumentsByTypeMatch`. The bug [llvm#51171](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51171) was filled. The reproducer can be found at the bug description. LIT test for the issue was added: ``` ./bin/llvm-lit -v ../clang/test/SemaCXX/pr51171-crash.cpp ``` The debug stack trace is below: ``` #0 0x00000000055afcb9 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:565:22 #1 0x00000000055afd70 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:632:1 #2 0x00000000055add2d llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:97:20 #3 0x00000000055af701 SignalHandler(int) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:407:1 #4 0x00007ffff7bc2b20 __restore_rt sigaction.c:0:0 #5 0x00007ffff66a337f raise (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3737f) #6 0x00007ffff668ddb5 abort (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21db5) #7 0x00007ffff668dc89 _nl_load_domain.cold.0 loadmsgcat.c:0:0 #8 0x00007ffff669ba76 .annobin___GI___assert_fail.end assert.c:0:0 #9 0x000000000594b210 clang::QualType::getCommonPtr() const /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/Type.h:684:5 #10 0x0000000005a12ca6 clang::QualType::getCanonicalType() const /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/Type.h:6467:36 #11 0x0000000005a137a6 clang::ASTContext::getCanonicalType(clang::QualType) const /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h:2433:58 #12 0x0000000009204584 DeduceTemplateArgumentsByTypeMatch(clang::Sema&, clang::TemplateParameterList*, clang::QualType, clang::QualType, clang::sema::TemplateDeductionInfo&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::DeducedTemplateArgument>&, unsigned int, bool, bool) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:1355:54 #13 0x000000000920df0d clang::Sema::DeduceTemplateArguments(clang::FunctionTemplateDecl*, clang::TemplateArgumentListInfo*, clang::QualType, clang::FunctionDecl*&, clang::sema::TemplateDeductionInfo&, bool) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4354:47 #14 0x0000000009012b09 (anonymous namespace)::AddressOfFunctionResolver::AddMatchingTemplateFunction(clang::FunctionTemplateDecl*, clang::DeclAccessPair const&) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:12026:38 #15 0x0000000009013030 (anonymous namespace)::AddressOfFunctionResolver::FindAllFunctionsThatMatchTargetTypeExactly() /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:12119:9 #16 0x0000000009012679 (anonymous namespace)::AddressOfFunctionResolver::AddressOfFunctionResolver(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::QualType const&, bool) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:11931:5 #17 0x0000000009013c91 clang::Sema::ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction(clang::Expr*, clang::QualType, bool, clang::DeclAccessPair&, bool*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:12286:42 #18 0x0000000008fed85d IsStandardConversion(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::QualType, bool, clang::StandardConversionSequence&, bool, bool) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:1712:49 #19 0x0000000008fec8ea TryImplicitConversion(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::QualType, bool, clang::Sema::AllowedExplicit, bool, bool, bool, bool) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:1433:27 #20 0x0000000008ff90ba TryCopyInitialization(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::QualType, bool, bool, bool, bool) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:5273:71 #21 0x00000000090024fb clang::Sema::AddBuiltinCandidate(clang::QualType*, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Expr*>, clang::OverloadCandidateSet&, bool, unsigned int) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:7755:32 #22 0x000000000900513f (anonymous namespace)::BuiltinOperatorOverloadBuilder::addGenericBinaryArithmeticOverloads() /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:8633:30 #23 0x0000000009007624 clang::Sema::AddBuiltinOperatorCandidates(clang::OverloadedOperatorKind, clang::SourceLocation, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Expr*>, clang::OverloadCandidateSet&) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:9205:51 #24 0x0000000009018734 clang::Sema::LookupOverloadedBinOp(clang::OverloadCandidateSet&, clang::OverloadedOperatorKind, clang::UnresolvedSetImpl const&, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Expr*>, bool) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:13469:1 #25 0x0000000009018d56 clang::Sema::CreateOverloadedBinOp(clang::SourceLocation, clang::BinaryOperatorKind, clang::UnresolvedSetImpl const&, clang::Expr*, clang::Expr*, bool, bool, clang::FunctionDecl*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:13568:24 #26 0x0000000008b24797 BuildOverloadedBinOp(clang::Sema&, clang::Scope*, clang::SourceLocation, clang::BinaryOperatorKind, clang::Expr*, clang::Expr*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:14606:65 #27 0x0000000008b24ed5 clang::Sema::BuildBinOp(clang::Scope*, clang::SourceLocation, clang::BinaryOperatorKind, clang::Expr*, clang::Expr*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:14691:73 #28 0x0000000008b245d4 clang::Sema::ActOnBinOp(clang::Scope*, clang::SourceLocation, clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::Expr*, clang::Expr*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:14566:1 #29 0x00000000085bfafb clang::Parser::ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(clang::ActionResult<clang::Expr*, true>, clang::prec::Level) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp:630:71 #30 0x00000000085bd922 clang::Parser::ParseAssignmentExpression(clang::Parser::TypeCastState) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp:177:1 #31 0x00000000085cbbcd clang::Parser::ParseExpressionList(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::Expr*>&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::SourceLocation>&, llvm::function_ref<void ()>) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp:3368:40 #32 0x000000000857f49c clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(clang::Declarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2416:5 #33 0x000000000857df16 clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2092:65 #34 0x000000000855f07b clang::Parser::ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal(clang::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::AccessSpecifier) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1138:1 #35 0x000000000855f136 clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition(clang::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*, clang::AccessSpecifier) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1153:57 #36 0x000000000855e644 clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:975:58 #37 0x000000000855d717 clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, bool) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:720:42 #38 0x0000000008558e01 clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:158:37 #39 0x000000000627a221 clang::ASTFrontendAction::ExecuteAction() /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1058:11 #40 0x0000000006bdcc31 clang::CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction() /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp:1045:5 #41 0x0000000006279b4d clang::FrontendAction::Execute() /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:955:38 #42 0x00000000061c3fe9 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:974:42 #43 0x00000000063f9c5e clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:278:38 #44 0x0000000002603a03 cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:246:40 #45 0x00000000025f8a39 ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:338:20 #46 0x00000000025f9107 main /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:415:26 #47 0x00007ffff668f493 __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x23493) #48 0x00000000025f729e _start (/data/users/ivanmurashko/llvm-project/build/bin/clang-13+0x25f729e) ``` Reviewed By: erichkeane Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106583
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2021
This reverts commit a2768b4. Breaks sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast buildbot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/11334 Log snippet: Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80 FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll (65549 of 78729) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 1'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll -instcombine -sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/einline.prof -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples' #0 0x5a730f8 in shouldInlineCandidate /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 #1 0x5a730f8 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::tryInlineCandidate((anonymous namespace)::InlineCandidate&, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::CallBase*, 8u>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1178:21 #2 0x5a6cda6 in inlineHotFunctions /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1105:13 #3 0x5a6cda6 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::emitAnnotations(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1633:16 #4 0x5a5fcbe in runOnFunction /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2008:12 #5 0x5a5fcbe in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::runOnModule(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>*, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*, llvm::CallGraph*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1922:15 #6 0x5a5de55 in llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2038:21 #7 0x6552a01 in llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass, llvm::PreservedAnalyses, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:88:17 #8 0x57f807c in llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:526:21 #9 0x37c8522 in llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:489:7 #10 0x37e7c11 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:830:12 #11 0x7fbf4de4009a in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409a) #12 0x379e519 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt+0x379e519) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 in FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. FileCheck command line: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll -- ******************** Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80 FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll (65643 of 78729) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 4'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=NOTINLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 5'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=NOTINLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 8'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -sample-profile-inline-size -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 11'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -sample-profile-inline-size -sample-profile-cold-inline-threshold=9999999 -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 14'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -sample-profile-inline-size -sample-profile-cold-inline-threshold=-500 -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=NOTINLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples' #0 0x5a730f8 in shouldInlineCandidate /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 #1 0x5a730f8 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::tryInlineCandidate((anonymous namespace)::InlineCandidate&, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::CallBase*, 8u>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1178:21 #2 0x5a6cda6 in inlineHotFunctions /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1105:13 #3 0x5a6cda6 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::emitAnnotations(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1633:16 #4 0x5a5fcbe in runOnFunction /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2008:12 #5 0x5a5fcbe in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::runOnModule(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>*, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*, llvm::CallGraph*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1922:15 #6 0x5a5de55 in llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2038:21 #7 0x6552a01 in llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass, llvm::PreservedAnalyses, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:88:17 #8 0x57f807c in llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:526:21 #9 0x37c8522 in llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:489:7 #10 0x37e7c11 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:830:12 #11 0x7fcd534a209a in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409a) #12 0x379e519 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt+0x379e519) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 in FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. FileCheck command line: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -- ******************** Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90.. ******************** Failed Tests (2): LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll
bulbazord
pushed a commit
to bulbazord/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2023
…ak ordering
`std::sort` requires a comparison operator that obides by strict weak
ordering. `operator<=` on pointer does not and leads to undefined
behaviour. Specifically, when we grow the `scratch_type_systems` vector
slightly larger (and thus take `std::sort` down a slightly different
codepath), we segfault. This happened while working on a patch that
would in fact grow this vector. In such a case ASAN reports:
```
$ ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/lang/cpp/complete-type-check/TestCppIsTypeComplete.test_builtin_types/a.out -o "script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType(\"void\")"
(lldb) script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType("void")
=================================================================
==59975==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: container-overflow on address 0x000108f6b510 at pc 0x000280177b4c bp 0x00016b7d7430 sp 0x00016b7d7428
READ of size 8 at 0x000108f6b510 thread T0
#0 0x280177b48 in std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>::shared_ptr[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0xb4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x177b48)
(BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#1 0x280dcc008 in void std::__1::__introsort<std::__1::_ClassicAlgPolicy, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, std::__1::shared_
ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::iterator_traits<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>::difference_type)+0x1050 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblld
b.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdcc008) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#2 0x280d88788 in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x5a4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88788) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#3 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#4 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#5 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/[email protected]/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
<--- snipped --->
0x000108f6b510 is located 400 bytes inside of 512-byte region [0x000108f6b380,0x000108f6b580)
allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x105209414 in wrap__Znwm+0x74 (/Applications/Xcode2.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/clang/14.0.3/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x51414) (BuildId: 0a44828ceb64337bbfff60b22cd838f0320000
00200000000100000000000b00)
swiftlang#1 0x280dca3b4 in std::__1::__split_buffer<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&>::__split_buffer(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_pt
r<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&)+0x11c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdca3b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#2 0x280dc978c in void std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::__push_back_slow_path<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&>(std::__1::s
hared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x13c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdc978c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#3 0x280d88dec in std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::push_back[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x80 (/Users/mic
haelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88dec) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#4 0x280d8857c in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x398 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd8857c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#5 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#6 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#7 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/[email protected]/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#8 0x10627fff0 in _PyObject_MakeTpCall+0x7c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/[email protected]/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x7bff0) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
swiftlang#9 0x106378a98 in _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault+0xbcf8 (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/[email protected]/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x174a98) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142709
(cherry picked from commit 78fee46)
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2023
[ARM] generate armv6m eXecute Only (XO) code for immediates, globals Previously eXecute Only (XO) support was implemented for targets that support MOVW/MOVT (~armv7+). See: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27449 XO prevents the compiler from generating data accesses to code sections. This patch implements XO codegen for armv6-M, which does not support MOVW/MOVT, and must resort to the following general pattern to avoid loads: movs r3, :upper8_15:foo lsls r3, #8 adds r3, :upper0_7:foo lsls r3, #8 adds r3, :lower8_15:foo lsls r3, #8 adds r3, :lower0_7:foo ldr r3, [r3] This is equivalent to the code pattern generated by GCC. The above relocations are new to LLVM and have been implemented in a parent patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149443. This patch limits itself to implementing codegen for this pattern and enabling XO for armv6-M in the backend. Separate patches will follow for: - switch tables - replacing specific loads from constant islands which are spread out over the ARM backend codebase. Amongst others: FastISel, call lowering, stack frames. Reviewed By: john.brawn Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152795
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2023
…tput The crash happens in clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName when Output is InputInfo::Nothing. It doesn't happen with standalone clang driver because output is created in Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache. Example backtrace: ``` * thread #1, name = 'clangd', stop reason = hit program assert * frame #0: 0x00007ffff5c4eacf libc.so.6`raise + 271 frame #1: 0x00007ffff5c21ea5 libc.so.6`abort + 295 frame #2: 0x00007ffff5c21d79 libc.so.6`__assert_fail_base.cold.0 + 15 frame #3: 0x00007ffff5c47426 libc.so.6`__assert_fail + 70 frame #4: 0x000055555dc0923c clangd`clang::driver::InputInfo::getFilename(this=0x00007fffffff9398) const at InputInfo.h:84:5 frame #5: 0x000055555dcd0d8d clangd`clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName(JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, Input=0x00007fffffff9678, Output=0x00007fffffff9398) at CommonArgs.cpp:1275:40 frame #6: 0x000055555dc955a5 clangd`clang::driver::tools::Clang::ConstructJob(this=0x000055555f6c69d0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Output=0x00007fffffff9398, Inputs=0x00007fffffff9668, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000) const at Clang.cpp:5690:33 frame #7: 0x000055555dbf6b54 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5618:10 frame #8: 0x000055555dbf4ef0 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForAction(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5306:26 frame #9: 0x000055555dbeb590 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobs(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0) const at Driver.cpp:4844:5 frame #10: 0x000055555dbe6b0f clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffb268) at Driver.cpp:1496:3 frame #11: 0x000055555b0cc0d9 clangd`clang::createInvocation(ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffbb38, Opts=CreateInvocationOptions @ 0x00007fffffffbb90) at CreateInvocationFromCommandLine.cpp:53:52 frame #12: 0x000055555b378e7b clangd`clang::clangd::buildCompilerInvocation(Inputs=0x00007fffffffca58, D=0x00007fffffffc158, CC1Args=size=0) at Compiler.cpp:116:44 frame #13: 0x000055555895a6c8 clangd`clang::clangd::(anonymous namespace)::Checker::buildInvocation(this=0x00007fffffffc760, TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Contents= Has Value=false ) at Check.cpp:212:9 frame #14: 0x0000555558959cec clangd`clang::clangd::check(File=(Data = "build/test.cpp", Length = 64), TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Opts=0x00007fffffffe600) at Check.cpp:486:34 frame #15: 0x000055555892164a clangd`main(argc=4, argv=0x00007fffffffecd8) at ClangdMain.cpp:993:12 frame #16: 0x00007ffff5c3ad85 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 229 frame #17: 0x00005555585bbe9e clangd`_start + 46 ``` Test Plan: ninja ClangDriverTests && tools/clang/unittests/Driver/ClangDriverTests Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154602
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2023
This reverts commit 0e63f1a. clang-format started to crash with contents like: a.h: ``` ``` $ clang-format a.h ``` PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: ../llvm/build/bin/clang-format a.h #0 0x0000560b689fe177 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:13 #1 0x0000560b689fbfbe llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:106:18 #2 0x0000560b689feaca SignalHandler(int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:413:1 #3 0x00007f030405a540 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3c540) #4 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/include/clang/Lex/Token.h:98:44 #5 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:562:51 #6 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequenceInternal<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:831:9 #7 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequence<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:600:12 #8 0x0000560b68a9a980 getFunctionName /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3131:17 #9 0x0000560b68a9a980 clang::format::TokenAnnotator::annotate(clang::format::AnnotatedLine&) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3191:17 Segmentation fault ```
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2023
…fine.parallel verifier
This patch updates AffineParallelOp::verify() to check each result type matches
its corresponding reduction op (i.e, the result type must be a `FloatType` if
the reduction attribute is `addf`)
affine.parallel will crash on --lower-affine if the corresponding result type
cannot match the reduction attribute.
```
%128 = affine.parallel (%arg2, %arg3) = (0, 0) to (8, 7) reduce ("maxf") -> (memref<8x7xf32>) {
%alloc_33 = memref.alloc() : memref<8x7xf32>
affine.yield %alloc_33 : memref<8x7xf32>
}
```
This will crash and report a type conversion issue when we run `mlir-opt --lower-affine`
```
Assertion failed: (isa<To>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"), function cast, file Casting.h, line 572.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: mlir-opt --lower-affine temp.mlir
#0 0x0000000102a18f18 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f8f18)
#1 0x0000000102a171b4 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f71b4)
#2 0x0000000102a195c4 SignalHandler(int) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f95c4)
#3 0x00000001be7894c4 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x1803414c4)
#4 0x00000001be771ee0 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib+0x180329ee0)
#5 0x00000001be6ac340 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x180264340)
#6 0x00000001be6ab754 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x180263754)
#7 0x0000000106864790 mlir::arith::getIdentityValueAttr(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (.cold.4) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x104144790)
#8 0x0000000102ba66ac mlir::arith::getIdentityValueAttr(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1004866ac)
#9 0x0000000102ba6910 mlir::arith::getIdentityValue(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x100486910)
...
```
Fixes llvm#64068
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157985
augusto2112
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2023
After 89d458b and #7662, the code of MetadataLoader.cpp allows the new NumExtraInhabitants field, but it always supposes it is available. Some tests do not seem to like that. When compiling with asserts, binaries like `opt` will crash with an assertion accessing `SmallVector` indices out of bounts, while in no-asserts it just keeps going, probably using garbage values. Change two places where the `Record` was accessed with `operator[]` without first checking for the `Record` size to check for the size. Use a default of `0` in case the record is not found. The test that failed before these changes are: ``` LLVM :: Bitcode/DIExpression-4.0.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIExpression-aggresult.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIExpression-deref.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIExpression-minus-upgrade.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIGlobalVariableExpression.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIGlobalVariableExpression2.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIModule-fortran-module.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DINamespace.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DISubprogram-v4.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DISubprogram-v5.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/diglobalvariable-3.8.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/dilocalvariable-3.9.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/disubrange-v0.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/dityperefs-3.8.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/invalid.test LLVM :: Bitcode/upgrade-cu-locals.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/upgrade-dbg-addr.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/upgrade-dbg-value.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/upgrade-pointer-address-space.ll LLVM :: ThinLTO/X86/drop-debug-info.ll ``` The failure looked like the following: ``` Assertion failed: (idx < size()), function operator[], file SmallVector.h, line 294. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis -o - /Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/llvm-project/llvm/test/Bitcode/DIExpression-minus-upgrade.ll.bc #0 0x00000001003507b7 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1001ca7b7) #1 0x000000010034ed55 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1001c8d55) #2 0x0000000100351040 SignalHandler(int) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1001cb040) #3 0x00007ff805ec05ed (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x7ff8004245ed) #4 0x0000000000000000 #5 0x00007ff805db9b45 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x7ff80031db45) #6 0x00007ff805db8e5e (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x7ff80031ce5e) #7 0x0000000100385573 llvm::MetadataLoader::MetadataLoaderImpl::parseOneMetadata(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned long long>&, unsigned int, (anonymous namespace)::(anonymous namespace)::PlaceholderQueue&, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int&) (.cold.50) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1001ff573) #8 0x00000001001d13a3 llvm::MetadataLoader::MetadataLoaderImpl::parseOneMetadata(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned long long>&, unsigned int, (anonymous namespace)::(anonymous namespace)::PlaceholderQueue&, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int&) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x10004b3a3) #9 0x00000001001c9496 llvm::MetadataLoader::MetadataLoaderImpl::parseMetadata(bool) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x100043496) #10 0x00000001001d2f71 llvm::MetadataLoader::parseMetadata(bool) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x10004cf71) #11 0x00000001001b33b7 (anonymous namespace)::BitcodeReader::parseModule(unsigned long long, bool, llvm::ParserCallbacks) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x10002d3b7) #12 0x000000010018f2f5 llvm::BitcodeModule::getModuleImpl(llvm::LLVMContext&, bool, bool, bool, llvm::ParserCallbacks) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1000092f5) #13 0x000000010019008a llvm::BitcodeModule::getLazyModule(llvm::LLVMContext&, bool, bool, llvm::ParserCallbacks) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x10000a08a) #14 0x0000000100189593 main (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x100003593) #15 0x0000000200a0941f ``` With these changes, those tests all pass and the crash does not reproduce.
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2023
…tePluginObject After llvm#68052 this function changed from returning a nullptr with `return {};` to returning Expected and hitting `llvm_unreachable` before it could do so. I gather that we're never supposed to call this function, but on Windows we actually do call this function because `interpreter->CreateScriptedProcessInterface()` returns `ScriptedProcessInterface` not `ScriptedProcessPythonInterface`. Likely because `target_sp->GetDebugger().GetScriptInterpreter()` also does not return a Python related class. The previously XFAILed test crashed with: ``` # .---command stderr------------ # | PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. # | Stack dump: # | 0. Program arguments: c:\\users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\build-llvm\\bin\\lldb-test.exe ir-memory-map C:\\Users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\build-llvm\\tools\\lldb\\test\\Shell\\Expr\\Output\\TestIRMemoryMapWindows.test.tmp C:\\Users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\llvm-project\\lldb\\test\\Shell\\Expr/Inputs/ir-memory-map-basic # | 1. HandleCommand(command = "run") # | Exception Code: 0xC000001D # | #0 0x00007ff696b5f588 lldb_private::ScriptedProcessInterface::CreatePluginObject(class llvm::StringRef, class lldb_private::ExecutionContext &, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::StructuredData::Dictionary>, class lldb_private::StructuredData::Generic *) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\include\lldb\Interpreter\Interfaces\ScriptedProcessInterface.h:28:0 # | #1 0x00007ff696b1d808 llvm::Expected<std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::StructuredData::Generic> >::operator bool C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\llvm\include\llvm\Support\Error.h:567:0 # | #2 0x00007ff696b1d808 lldb_private::ScriptedProcess::ScriptedProcess(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::ScriptedMetadata const &, class lldb_private::Status &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Process\scripted\ScriptedProcess.cpp:115:0 # | #3 0x00007ff696b1d124 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ScriptedProcess>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1478:0 # | #4 0x00007ff696b1d124 lldb_private::ScriptedProcess::CreateInstance(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Process\scripted\ScriptedProcess.cpp:61:0 # | #5 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0 # | #6 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0 # | #7 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0 # | #8 0x00007ff69699c8f4 lldb_private::Process::FindPlugin(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class llvm::StringRef, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Process.cpp:396:0 # | #9 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0 # | #10 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0 # | #11 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0 # | #12 0x00007ff6969bd708 lldb_private::Target::CreateProcess(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class llvm::StringRef, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Target.cpp:215:0 # | #13 0x00007ff696b13af0 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Ptr_base C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1230:0 # | #14 0x00007ff696b13af0 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1524:0 # | #15 0x00007ff696b13af0 lldb_private::PlatformWindows::DebugProcess(class lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo &, class lldb_private::Debugger &, class lldb_private::Target &, class lldb_private::Status &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Platform\Windows\PlatformWindows.cpp:495:0 # | #16 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0 # | #17 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0 # | #18 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0 # | #19 0x00007ff6969cf590 lldb_private::Target::Launch(class lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo &, class lldb_private::Stream *) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Target.cpp:3274:0 # | #20 0x00007ff696fff82c CommandObjectProcessLaunch::DoExecute(class lldb_private::Args &, class lldb_private::CommandReturnObject &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Commands\CommandObjectProcess.cpp:258:0 # | #21 0x00007ff696fab6c0 lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(char const *, class lldb_private::CommandReturnObject &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Interpreter\CommandObject.cpp:751:0 # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: 0xc000001d ``` That might be a bug on the Windows side, or an artifact of how our build is setup, but whatever it is, having `CreatePluginObject` return an error and the caller check it, fixes the failing test. The built lldb can run the script command to use Python, but I'm not sure if that means anything.
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2023
…ooking options for a custom subcommand (llvm#71975) …ooking options for a custom subcommand. (llvm#71776)" This reverts commit b88308b. The build-bot is unhappy (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/13096), `GroupingAndPrefix` fails after `TopLevelOptInSubcommand` (the newly added test). Revert while I look into this (might be related with test sharding but not sure) ``` [----------] 3 tests from CommandLineTest [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2 [ OK ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2 (0 ms) [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand [ OK ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand (0 ms) [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.GroupingAndPrefix #0 0x00ba8118 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x594118) #1 0x00ba5914 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x591914) #2 0x00ba89c4 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5949c4) #3 0xf7828530 __default_sa_restorer /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/sigrestorer.S:67:0 #4 0x00af91f0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineParser::ResetAllOptionOccurrences() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e51f0) #5 0x00af8e1c llvm::cl::ResetCommandLineParser() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e4e1c) #6 0x0077cda0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineTest_GroupingAndPrefix_Test::TestBody() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x168da0) #7 0x00bc5adc testing::Test::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b1adc) #8 0x00bc6cc0 testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b2cc0) #9 0x00bc7880 testing::TestSuite::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b3880) #10 0x00bd7974 testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c3974) #11 0x00bd6ebc testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c2ebc) #12 0x00bb1058 main (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x59d058) #13 0xf78185a4 __libc_start_main /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/csu/libc-start.c:342:3 ```
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2023
This has been flaky for a while, for example https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/50350 ``` Command Output (stdout): -- lldb version 18.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git revision 3974d89) clang revision 3974d89 llvm revision 3974d89 "can't evaluate expressions when the process is running." ``` ``` PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. #0 0x0000ffffa46191a0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x529a1a0) #1 0x0000ffffa4617144 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x5298144) #2 0x0000ffffa46198d0 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x529a8d0) #3 0x0000ffffab25b7dc (linux-vdso.so.1+0x7dc) #4 0x0000ffffab13d050 /build/glibc-Q8DG8B/glibc-2.31/string/../sysdeps/aarch64/multiarch/memcpy_advsimd.S:92:0 #5 0x0000ffffa446f420 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::PrivateSetRegisterValue(unsigned int, llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned char>) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f0420) #6 0x0000ffffa446f7b8 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::GetPrimordialRegister(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunicationClient&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f07b8) #7 0x0000ffffa446f308 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::ReadRegisterBytes(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f0308) #8 0x0000ffffa446ec1c lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::ReadRegister(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, lldb_private::RegisterValue&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50efc1c) #9 0x0000ffffa412eaa4 lldb_private::RegisterContext::ReadRegisterAsUnsigned(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, unsigned long) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4dafaa4) #10 0x0000ffffa420861c ReadLinuxProcessAddressMask(std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>, llvm::StringRef) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4e8961c) #11 0x0000ffffa4208430 ABISysV_arm64::FixCodeAddress(unsigned long) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4e89430) ``` Judging by the backtrace something is trying to read the pointer authentication address/code mask registers. This explains why I've not seen this issue locally, as the buildbot runs on Graviton 3 with has the pointer authentication extension. I will try to reproduce, fix and re-enable the test.
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
… smstart/smstop. (llvm#78294) This patch introduces a 'COALESCER_BARRIER' which is a pseudo node that expands to a 'nop', but which stops the register allocator from coalescing a COPY node when its use/def crosses a SMSTART or SMSTOP instruction. For example: %0:fpr64 = COPY killed $d0 undef %2.dsub:zpr = COPY %0 // <- Do not coalesce this COPY ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0 MSRpstatesvcrImm1 1, 0, csr_aarch64_smstartstop, implicit-def dead $d0 $d0 = COPY killed %0 BL @use_f64, csr_aarch64_aapcs If the COPY would be coalesced, that would lead to: $d0 = COPY killed %0 being replaced by: $d0 = COPY killed %2.dsub which means the whole ZPR reg would be live upto the call, causing the MSRpstatesvcrImm1 (smstop) to spill/reload the ZPR register: str q0, [sp] // 16-byte Folded Spill smstop sm ldr z0, [sp] // 16-byte Folded Reload bl use_f64 which would be incorrect for two reasons: 1. The program may load more data than it has allocated. 2. If there are other SVE objects on the stack, the compiler might use the 'mul vl' addressing modes to access the spill location. By disabling the coalescing, we get the desired results: str d0, [sp, #8] // 8-byte Folded Spill smstop sm ldr d0, [sp, #8] // 8-byte Folded Reload bl use_f64
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
… smstart/smstop. (llvm#78294) This patch introduces a 'COALESCER_BARRIER' which is a pseudo node that expands to a 'nop', but which stops the register allocator from coalescing a COPY node when its use/def crosses a SMSTART or SMSTOP instruction. For example: %0:fpr64 = COPY killed $d0 undef %2.dsub:zpr = COPY %0 // <- Do not coalesce this COPY ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0 MSRpstatesvcrImm1 1, 0, csr_aarch64_smstartstop, implicit-def dead $d0 $d0 = COPY killed %0 BL @use_f64, csr_aarch64_aapcs If the COPY would be coalesced, that would lead to: $d0 = COPY killed %0 being replaced by: $d0 = COPY killed %2.dsub which means the whole ZPR reg would be live upto the call, causing the MSRpstatesvcrImm1 (smstop) to spill/reload the ZPR register: str q0, [sp] // 16-byte Folded Spill smstop sm ldr z0, [sp] // 16-byte Folded Reload bl use_f64 which would be incorrect for two reasons: 1. The program may load more data than it has allocated. 2. If there are other SVE objects on the stack, the compiler might use the 'mul vl' addressing modes to access the spill location. By disabling the coalescing, we get the desired results: str d0, [sp, #8] // 8-byte Folded Spill smstop sm ldr d0, [sp, #8] // 8-byte Folded Reload bl use_f64 (cherry picked from commit dd73666)
augusto2112
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
After 89d458b and #7662, the code of MetadataLoader.cpp allows the new NumExtraInhabitants field, but it always supposes it is available. Some tests do not seem to like that. When compiling with asserts, binaries like `opt` will crash with an assertion accessing `SmallVector` indices out of bounts, while in no-asserts it just keeps going, probably using garbage values. Change two places where the `Record` was accessed with `operator[]` without first checking for the `Record` size to check for the size. Use a default of `0` in case the record is not found. The test that failed before these changes are: ``` LLVM :: Bitcode/DIExpression-4.0.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIExpression-aggresult.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIExpression-deref.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIExpression-minus-upgrade.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIGlobalVariableExpression.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIGlobalVariableExpression2.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DIModule-fortran-module.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DINamespace.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DISubprogram-v4.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DISubprogram-v5.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/diglobalvariable-3.8.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/dilocalvariable-3.9.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/disubrange-v0.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/dityperefs-3.8.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/invalid.test LLVM :: Bitcode/upgrade-cu-locals.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/upgrade-dbg-addr.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/upgrade-dbg-value.ll LLVM :: Bitcode/upgrade-pointer-address-space.ll LLVM :: ThinLTO/X86/drop-debug-info.ll ``` The failure looked like the following: ``` Assertion failed: (idx < size()), function operator[], file SmallVector.h, line 294. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis -o - /Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/llvm-project/llvm/test/Bitcode/DIExpression-minus-upgrade.ll.bc #0 0x00000001003507b7 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1001ca7b7) #1 0x000000010034ed55 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1001c8d55) #2 0x0000000100351040 SignalHandler(int) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1001cb040) #3 0x00007ff805ec05ed (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x7ff8004245ed) #4 0x0000000000000000 #5 0x00007ff805db9b45 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x7ff80031db45) #6 0x00007ff805db8e5e (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x7ff80031ce5e) #7 0x0000000100385573 llvm::MetadataLoader::MetadataLoaderImpl::parseOneMetadata(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned long long>&, unsigned int, (anonymous namespace)::(anonymous namespace)::PlaceholderQueue&, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int&) (.cold.50) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1001ff573) #8 0x00000001001d13a3 llvm::MetadataLoader::MetadataLoaderImpl::parseOneMetadata(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned long long>&, unsigned int, (anonymous namespace)::(anonymous namespace)::PlaceholderQueue&, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int&) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x10004b3a3) #9 0x00000001001c9496 llvm::MetadataLoader::MetadataLoaderImpl::parseMetadata(bool) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x100043496) #10 0x00000001001d2f71 llvm::MetadataLoader::parseMetadata(bool) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x10004cf71) #11 0x00000001001b33b7 (anonymous namespace)::BitcodeReader::parseModule(unsigned long long, bool, llvm::ParserCallbacks) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x10002d3b7) #12 0x000000010018f2f5 llvm::BitcodeModule::getModuleImpl(llvm::LLVMContext&, bool, bool, bool, llvm::ParserCallbacks) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x1000092f5) #13 0x000000010019008a llvm::BitcodeModule::getLazyModule(llvm::LLVMContext&, bool, bool, llvm::ParserCallbacks) (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x10000a08a) #14 0x0000000100189593 main (/Users/danielrodriguez/code/swift-source/build/my_macos/llvm-macosx-x86_64/bin/llvm-dis+0x100003593) #15 0x0000000200a0941f ``` With these changes, those tests all pass and the crash does not reproduce. (cherry picked from commit dc75586)
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
…lvm#80904)" This reverts commit b1ac052. This commit breaks coroutine splitting for non-swift calling convention functions. In this example: ```ll ; ModuleID = 'repro.ll' source_filename = "stdlib/test/runtime/test_llcl.mojo" target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" @0 = internal constant { i32, i32 } { i32 trunc (i64 sub (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @craSH to i64), i64 ptrtoint (ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, i32 }, ptr @0, i32 0, i32 1) to i64)) to i32), i32 64 } define dso_local void @af_suspend_fn(ptr %0, i64 %1, ptr %2) #0 { ret void } define dso_local void @craSH(ptr %0) #0 { %2 = call token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32 64, i32 8, i32 0, ptr @0) %3 = call ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %2, ptr null) %4 = getelementptr inbounds { ptr, { ptr, ptr }, i64, { ptr, i1 }, i64, i64 }, ptr poison, i32 0, i32 0 %5 = call ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() store ptr %5, ptr %4, align 8 %6 = call { ptr, ptr, ptr } (i32, ptr, ptr, ...) @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32 0, ptr %5, ptr @ctxt_proj_fn, ptr @af_suspend_fn, ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) ret void } define dso_local ptr @ctxt_proj_fn(ptr %0) #0 { ret ptr %0 } ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare { ptr, ptr, ptr } @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32, ptr, ptr, ...) #1 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32, i32, i32, ptr) #2 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2 ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() #1 attributes #0 = { "target-features"="+adx,+aes,+avx,+avx2,+bmi,+bmi2,+clflushopt,+clwb,+clzero,+crc32,+cx16,+cx8,+f16c,+fma,+fsgsbase,+fxsr,+invpcid,+lzcnt,+mmx,+movbe,+mwaitx,+pclmul,+pku,+popcnt,+prfchw,+rdpid,+rdpru,+rdrnd,+rdseed,+sahf,+sha,+sse,+sse2,+sse3,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+sse4a,+ssse3,+vaes,+vpclmulqdq,+wbnoinvd,+x87,+xsave,+xsavec,+xsaveopt,+xsaves" } attributes #1 = { nomerge nounwind } attributes #2 = { nounwind } ``` This verifier crashes after the `coro-split` pass with ``` cannot guarantee tail call due to mismatched parameter counts musttail call void @af_suspend_fn(ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) LLVM ERROR: Broken function PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: opt ../../../reduced.ll -O0 #0 0x00007f1d89645c0e __interceptor_backtrace.part.0 /build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/asan/../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:4193:28 #1 0x0000556d94d254f7 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:22 #2 0x0000556d94d19a2f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20 #3 0x0000556d94d1aa42 SignalHandler(int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:371:36 #4 0x00007f1d88e42520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520) #5 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76 #6 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_internal ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78:10 #7 0x00007f1d88e969fc pthread_kill ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89:10 #8 0x00007f1d88e42476 gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6 #9 0x00007f1d88e287f3 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #10 0x0000556d8944be01 std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>::size() const /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:919:40 #11 0x0000556d8944be01 bool std::operator==<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>(std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&, std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&) /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:1893:23 #12 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Array const&, llvm::json::Array const&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/JSON.h:572:69 #13 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Value const&, llvm::json::Value const&) (.cold) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/JSON.cpp:204:28 #14 0x0000556d949ed2bd llvm::report_fatal_error(char const*, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp:82:70 #15 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorBase<unsigned int>::size() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:91:32 #16 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, void>::end() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:282:41 #17 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVector<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, 4u>::~SmallVector() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1215:24 #18 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::~DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:413:7 #19 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoIROptimization::~DiagnosticInfoIROptimization() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:622:7 #20 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::OptimizationRemark::~OptimizationRemark() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:689:7 #21 0x0000556d8e37e876 operator() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2213:14 #22 0x0000556d8e37e876 emit<llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::CGSCCAnalysisManager&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&)::<lambda()> > /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h:83:12 #23 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2212:13 #24 0x0000556d8c36ecb1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::CoroSplitPass, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #25 0x0000556d91c1a84f llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:90:12 #26 0x0000556d8c3690d1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #27 0x0000556d91c2162d llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:278:18 #28 0x0000556d8c369035 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #29 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #30 0x0000556d8e30979e llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroConditionalWrapper.cpp:19:74 #31 0x0000556d8c365755 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #32 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #33 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::isSmall() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:196:33 #34 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::~SmallPtrSetImplBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:84:17 #35 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImpl<llvm::AnalysisKey*>::~SmallPtrSetImpl() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:321:7 #36 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::AnalysisKey*, 2u>::~SmallPtrSet() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:427:7 #37 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::PreservedAnalyses::~PreservedAnalyses() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Analysis.h:109:7 #38 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::PassPlugin>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::function<void (llvm::PassBuilder&)>>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:532:10 #39 0x0000556d897e3939 optMain /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/optdriver.cpp:737:27 #40 0x0000556d89455461 main /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:25:33 #41 0x00007f1d88e29d90 __libc_start_call_main ./csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 #42 0x00007f1d88e29e40 call_init ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:128:20 #43 0x00007f1d88e29e40 __libc_start_main ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:379:5 #44 0x0000556d897b6335 _start (/home/ubuntu/modular/.derived/third-party/llvm-project/build-relwithdebinfo-asan/bin/opt+0x150c335) Aborted (core dumped)
jimingham
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
Don't count all the frames just to skip the current inlined ones. (#8…
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2024
TestCases/Misc/Linux/sigaction.cpp fails because dlsym() may call malloc on failure. And then the wrapped malloc appears to access thread local storage using global dynamic accesses, thus calling ___interceptor___tls_get_addr, before REAL(__tls_get_addr) has been set, so we get a crash inside ___interceptor___tls_get_addr. For example, this can happen when looking up __isoc23_scanf which might not exist in some libcs. Fix this by marking the thread local variable accessed inside the debug checks as "initial-exec", which does not require __tls_get_addr. This is probably a better alternative to llvm#83886. This fixes a different crash but is related to llvm#46204. Backtrace: ``` #0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #1 0x00007ffff6a9d89e in ___interceptor___tls_get_addr (arg=0x7ffff6b27be8) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:2759 #2 0x00007ffff6a46bc6 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::LockImpl (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:218 #3 0x00007ffff6a448b2 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:129 #4 __sanitizer::Mutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:167 #5 0x00007ffff6abdbb2 in __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock (mu=0x730000000580, this=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:383 #6 __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>::GetFromAllocator (this=0x7ffff7487dc0 <__tsan::allocator_placeholder>, stat=stat@entry=0x7ffff570db68, class_id=11, chunks=chunks@entry=0x7ffff5702cc8, n_chunks=n_chunks@entry=128) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:207 #7 0x00007ffff6abdaa0 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Refill (this=<optimized out>, c=c@entry=0x7ffff5702cb8, allocator=<optimized out>, class_id=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:103 #8 0x00007ffff6abd731 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Allocate (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, allocator=0x7ffff5702cc8, class_id=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:39 #9 0x00007ffff6abc397 in __sanitizer::CombinedAllocator<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>, __sanitizer::LargeMmapAllocatorPtrArrayDynamic>::Allocate (this=0x7ffff5702cc8, cache=0x7ffff6b27be8, size=<optimized out>, size@entry=175, alignment=alignment@entry=16) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_combined.h:69 #10 0x00007ffff6abaa6a in __tsan::user_alloc_internal (thr=0x7ffff7ebd980, pc=140737331499943, sz=sz@entry=175, align=align@entry=16, signal=true) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:198 #11 0x00007ffff6abb0d1 in __tsan::user_alloc (thr=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066, sz=11, sz@entry=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:223 #12 0x00007ffff6a693b5 in ___interceptor_malloc (size=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:666 #13 0x00007ffff7fce7f2 in malloc (size=175) at ../include/rtld-malloc.h:56 #14 __GI__dl_exception_create_format (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd0d0, objname=0x7ffff7fc3550 "/path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/cmake-build-all-sanitizers/lib/linux/libclang_rt.tsan-x86_64.so", fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff7ff2db9 "undefined symbol: %s%s%s") at ./elf/dl-exception.c:157 #15 0x00007ffff7fd50e8 in _dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", undef_map=<optimized out>, ref=0x7fffffffd148, symbol_scope=<optimized out>, version=<optimized out>, type_class=0, flags=2, skip_map=0x7ffff7fc35e0) at ./elf/dl-lookup.c:793 --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- #16 0x00007ffff656d6ed in do_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", who=0x7ffff6a3bb84 <__interception::InterceptFunction(char const*, unsigned long*, unsigned long, unsigned long)+36>, vers=vers@entry=0x0, flags=flags@entry=2) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:146 #17 0x00007ffff656d9dd in _dl_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, who=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:195 #18 0x00007ffff64a2854 in dlsym_doit (a=a@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:40 #19 0x00007ffff7fcc489 in __GI__dl_catch_exception (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd310, operate=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:237 #20 0x00007ffff7fcc5af in _dl_catch_error (objname=0x7fffffffd368, errstring=0x7fffffffd370, mallocedp=0x7fffffffd367, operate=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:256 #21 0x00007ffff64a2257 in _dlerror_run (operate=operate@entry=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=args@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlerror.c:138 #22 0x00007ffff64a28e5 in dlsym_implementation (dl_caller=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, handle=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:54 #23 ___dlsym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:68 #24 0x00007ffff6a3bb84 in __interception::GetFuncAddr (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:42 #25 __interception::InterceptFunction (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", ptr_to_real=0x7ffff74850e8 <__interception::real___isoc23_scanf>, func=11, trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:61 #26 0x00007ffff6a9f2d9 in InitializeCommonInterceptors () at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:10315 ``` Reviewed By: vitalybuka, MaskRay Pull Request: llvm#83890
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
llvm#85429) …5025)" This reverts commit 58ef9be. There is a bool to float casting issue that needs to be sorted out to make sure this is target independent
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2024
…ndling (llvm#76644) Fold BICi if all destination bits are already known to be zeroes ```llvm define <8 x i16> @haddu_known(<8 x i8> %a0, <8 x i8> %a1) { %x0 = zext <8 x i8> %a0 to <8 x i16> %x1 = zext <8 x i8> %a1 to <8 x i16> %hadd = call <8 x i16> @llvm.aarch64.neon.uhadd.v8i16(<8 x i16> %x0, <8 x i16> %x1) %res = and <8 x i16> %hadd, <i16 511, i16 511, i16 511, i16 511,i16 511, i16 511, i16 511, i16 511> ret <8 x i16> %res } declare <8 x i16> @llvm.aarch64.neon.uhadd.v8i16(<8 x i16>, <8 x i16>) ``` ``` haddu_known: // @haddu_known ushll v0.8h, v0.8b, #0 ushll v1.8h, v1.8b, #0 uhadd v0.8h, v0.8h, v1.8h bic v0.8h, #254, lsl #8 <-- this one will be removed as we know high bits are zero extended ret ``` Fixes llvm#53881 Fixes llvm#53622
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2024
…arallel fusion llvm#94391 (llvm#97607)" This reverts commit edbc0e3. Reason for rollback. ASAN complains about this PR: ==4320==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x502000006cd8 at pc 0x55e2978d63cf bp 0x7ffe6431c2b0 sp 0x7ffe6431c2a8 READ of size 8 at 0x502000006cd8 thread T0 #0 0x55e2978d63ce in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 #1 0x55e2978d63ce in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:156:11 #2 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 #3 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 #4 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #5 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #6 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #7 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 #8 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 #9 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #10 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #11 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #12 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 #13 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 #14 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 #15 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 #16 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #17 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #18 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 #19 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 #20 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 #21 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 #22 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 #23 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 #24 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 #25 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #26 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #27 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #28 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #29 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #30 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 #31 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 #32 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 #33 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 #34 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 #35 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 #36 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) #37 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 0x502000006cd8 is located 8 bytes inside of 16-byte region [0x502000006cd0,0x502000006ce0) freed by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130b7e2 in operator delete(void*, unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:155:3 #1 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_operator_delete<void *, unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979eb657 in __do_deallocate_handle_size<> #3 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_deallocate #4 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate #5 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate #6 0x55e2979eb657 in operator() #7 0x55e2979eb657 in ~vector #8 0x55e2979eb657 in mlir::Block::~Block() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:24:1 #9 0x55e2979ebc17 in deleteNode llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:42:39 #10 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:205:5 #11 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:209:39 #12 0x55e2979ebc17 in mlir::Block::erase() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:67:28 #13 0x55e297aef978 in mlir::RewriterBase::eraseBlock(mlir::Block*) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:245:10 #14 0x55e297af0563 in mlir::RewriterBase::inlineBlockBefore(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<mlir::Operation, false, false, void, false, void>, false, false>, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:331:3 #15 0x55e297af06d8 in mlir::RewriterBase::mergeBlocks(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:341:3 #16 0x55e297036608 in mlir::scf::ForOp::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:575:12 #17 0x55e2970673ca in mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::scf::ForOp>::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.h.inc:658:56 #18 0x55e2978d5feb in replaceWithAdditionalYields blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp.inc:105:14 #19 0x55e2978d5feb in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:135:14 #20 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 #21 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 #22 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #23 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #24 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #25 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 #26 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 #27 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #28 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #29 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #30 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 #31 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 #32 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 #33 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 #34 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #35 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #36 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 #37 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 #38 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 #39 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 #40 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 #41 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 #42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 #43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 #49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 #50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 #51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 previously allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130ab5d in operator new(unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:86:3 #1 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_operator_new<unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_allocate #3 0x55e2979ed5d4 in allocate #4 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __allocate_at_least<std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > #5 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __split_buffer #6 0x55e2979ed5d4 in mlir::BlockArgument* std::__u::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>>::__push_back_slow_path<mlir::BlockArgument const&>(mlir::BlockArgument const&) #7 0x55e2979ec0f2 in push_back #8 0x55e2979ec0f2 in mlir::Block::addArgument(mlir::Type, mlir::Location) mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:154:13 #9 0x55e29796e457 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2172:34 #10 0x55e29796e457 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 #11 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 #12 0x55e297035742 in mlir::scf::ForOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:521:14 #13 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 #14 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 #15 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #16 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #17 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 #18 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 #19 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 #20 0x55e297971d20 in parseBlockBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2296:9 #21 0x55e297971d20 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseBlock(mlir::Block*&) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2226:12 #22 0x55e29796e4f5 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2184:7 #23 0x55e29796e4f5 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 #24 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 #25 0x55e29796b2cf in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseOptionalRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1796:12 #26 0x55e2978d89ff in mlir::function_interface_impl::parseFunctionOp(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&, bool, mlir::StringAttr, llvm::function_ref<mlir::Type (mlir::Builder&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, mlir::function_interface_impl::VariadicFlag, std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>&)>, mlir::StringAttr, mlir::StringAttr) mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionImplementation.cpp:232:14 #27 0x55e2969ba41d in mlir::func::FuncOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Func/IR/FuncOps.cpp:203:10 #28 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 #29 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 #30 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #31 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #32 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 #33 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 #34 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 #35 0x55e297959b78 in parse mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2725:20 #36 0x55e297959b78 in mlir::parseAsmSourceFile(llvm::SourceMgr const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::AsmParserState*, mlir::AsmParserCodeCompleteContext*) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2785:41 #37 0x55e29790d5c2 in mlir::parseSourceFile(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::LocationAttr*) mlir/lib/Parser/Parser.cpp:46:10 #38 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp, const std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> &> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:159:14 #39 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:189:10 #40 0x55e291ebbfe2 in mlir::parseSourceFileForTool(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::ParserConfig const&, bool) mlir/include/mlir/Tools/ParseUtilities.h:31:12 #41 0x55e291ebb263 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:383:33 #42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 #43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 #49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 #50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 #51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 #52 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 #53 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 #54 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) #55 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x502000006a00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006a80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006b00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006b80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006c00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa fd fa =>0x502000006c80: fa fa fd fa fa fa fd fd fa fa fd[fd]fa fa fd fd 0x502000006d00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006d80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006f00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==4320==ABORTING
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
While lowering (#pragma omp target update from), clang's generated .omp_task_entry. is setting up 9 arguments while calling __tgt_target_data_update_nowait_mapper. At the same time, in __tgt_target_data_update_nowait_mapper, call to targetData<TaskAsyncInfoWrapperTy>() is converted to a sibcall assuming it has the argument count listed in the signature. AARCH64 asm sequence for this is as follows (removed unrelated insns): ` .omp_task_entry..108: sub sp, sp, #32 stp x29, x30, sp, #16 // 16-byte Folded Spill add x29, sp, #16 str x8, sp, #8. // stack canary str xzr, [sp] bl __tgt_target_data_update_nowait_mapper __tgt_target_data_update_nowait_mapper: sub sp, sp, #32 stp x29, x30, sp, #16 // 16-byte Folded Spill add x29, sp, #16 str x8, sp, #8 // stack canary // Sibcall argument setup adrp x8, :got:_Z16targetDataUpdateP7ident_tR8DeviceTyiPPvS4_PlS5_S4_S4_R11AsyncInfoTyb ldr x8, [x8, :got_lo12:_Z16targetDataUpdateP7ident_tR8DeviceTyiPPvS4_PlS5_S4_S4_R11AsyncInfoTyb] stp x9, x8, x29, #16 adrp x8, .L.str.8 add x8, x8, :lo12:.L.str.8 str x8, x29, #32. <==. This is the insn that erases $fp ldp x29, x30, sp, #16 // 16-byte Folded Reload add sp, sp, #32 // Sibcall b ZL10targetDataI22TaskAsyncInfoWrapperTyEvP7ident_tliPPvS4_PlS5_S4_S4_PFiS2_R8DeviceTyiS4_S4_S5_S5_S4_S4_R11AsyncInfoTybEPKcSD ` On AArch64, call to __tgt_target_data_update_nowait_mapper in .omp_task_entry. sets up only single space on stack and this results in ovewriting $fp and subsequent stack corruption. This issue can be credited to discrepancy of __tgt_target_data_update_nowait_mapper signature in openmp/libomptarget/include/omptarget.h taking 13 arguments while clang/lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntime.cpp and llvm/include/llvm/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPKinds.def taking only 9 arguments. This patch modifies __tgt_target_data_update_nowait_mapper signature to match .omp_task_entry usage(and other 2 files mentioned above). Co-authored-by: Kugan Vivekanandarajah <[email protected]>
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2024
…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ```
adrian-prantl
added a commit
to adrian-prantl/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2024
…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame swiftlang#4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame swiftlang#5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ``` (cherry picked from commit f01f80c)
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2024
…lvm#107294) Random testing revealed it's possible to crash the analyzer with the command line invocation: clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=nullability empty.c where the source file, empty.c is an empty source file. ``` clang: <root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.cpp:56: void clang::ento::CheckerManager::finishedCheckerRegistration(): Assertion `Event.second.HasDispatcher && "No dispatcher registered for an event"' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=nullability nullability-nocrash.c #0 ... ... #7 <addr> clang::ento::CheckerManager::finishedCheckerRegistration() #8 <addr> clang::ento::CheckerManager::CheckerManager(clang::ASTContext&, clang::AnalyzerOptions&, clang::Preprocessor const&, llvm::ArrayRef<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::function<void (clang::ento::CheckerRegistry&)>>) ``` This commit removes the assertion which failed here, because it was logically incorrect: it required that if an Event is handled by some (enabled) checker, then there must be an **enabled** checker which can emit that kind of Event. It should be OK to disable the event-producing checkers but enable an event-consuming checker which has different responsibilities in addition to handling the events. Note that this assertion was in an `#ifndef NDEBUG` block, so this change does not impact the non-debug builds. Co-authored-by: Vince Bridgers <[email protected]>
adrian-prantl
added a commit
to adrian-prantl/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2024
…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame swiftlang#4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame swiftlang#5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ``` (cherry picked from commit f01f80c)
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2024
Random testing found that the Z3 wrapper does not support UnarySymExpr, which was added recently and not included in the original Z3 wrapper. For now, just avoid submitting expressions to Z3 to avoid compiler crashes. Some crash context ... clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core z3-unarysymexpr.c -analyzer-constraints=z3 Unsupported expression to reason about! UNREACHABLE executed at clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SMTConstraintManager.h:297! Stack dump: 3. <root>/clang/test/Analysis/z3-unarysymexpr.c:13:7: Error evaluating branch #0 <addr> llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) #1 <addr> llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() #8 <addr> clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeAux( llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) #9 <addr> clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assume( llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) Co-authored-by: einvbri <[email protected]>
adrian-prantl
added a commit
to adrian-prantl/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2024
…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame swiftlang#4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame swiftlang#5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ``` (cherry picked from commit f01f80c)
Michael137
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2024
…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ``` (cherry picked from commit f01f80c)
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2024
…en issue Since llvm#109628 landed, this test has been failing on 32-bit Arm. This is due to a codegen problem (whether added or uncovered by the change, not known) where the trap instruction is placed after the frame pointer and link register are restored. llvm#113154 So the code was: ``` std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](unsigned int): sub sp, sp, #8 str r0, [sp, #4] str r1, [sp] add sp, sp, #8 .inst 0xe7ffdefe bx lr ``` When lldb saw the trap, the PC was inside operator[] but the frame information actually pointed to g. This bug only happens for leaf functions so adding a return type works around it: ``` std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](unsigned int): push {r11, lr} mov r11, sp sub sp, sp, #8 str r0, [sp, #4] str r1, [sp] mov sp, r11 pop {r11, lr} .inst 0xe7ffdefe bx lr ``` (and operator[] should return T& anyway) Now the PC location and frame information should match and the test passes.
swift-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
… depobj construct (llvm#114221) A codegen crash is occurring when a depend object was initialized with omp_all_memory in the depobj directive. llvm#114214 The root cause of issue looks to be the improper handling of the dependency list when omp_all_memory was specified. The change introduces the use of OMPTaskDataTy to manage dependencies. The buildDependences function is called to construct the dependency list, and the list is iterated over to emit and store the dependencies. Reduced Test Case : ``` #include <omp.h> int main() { omp_depend_t obj; #pragma omp depobj(obj) depend(inout: omp_all_memory) } ``` ``` #1 0x0000000003de6623 SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0 #2 0x00007f8e4a6b990f (/lib64/libpthread.so.0+0x1690f) #3 0x00007f8e4a117d2a raise (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x4ad2a) #4 0x00007f8e4a1193e4 abort (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x4c3e4) #5 0x00007f8e4a10fc69 __assert_fail_base (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x42c69) #6 0x00007f8e4a10fcf1 __assert_fail (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x42cf1) #7 0x0000000004114367 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitOMPDepobjDirective(clang::OMPDepobjDirective const&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x4114367) #8 0x00000000040f8fac clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitStmt(clang::Stmt const*, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Attr const*>) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x40f8fac) #9 0x00000000040ff4fb clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitCompoundStmtWithoutScope(clang::CompoundStmt const&, bool, clang::CodeGen::AggValueSlot) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x40ff4fb) #10 0x00000000041847b2 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitFunctionBody(clang::Stmt const*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x41847b2) #11 0x0000000004199e4a clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::GenerateCode(clang::GlobalDecl, llvm::Function*, clang::CodeGen::CGFunctionInfo const&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x4199e4a) #12 0x00000000041f7b9d clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitGlobalFunctionDefinition(clang::GlobalDecl, llvm::GlobalValue*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x41f7b9d) #13 0x00000000041f16a3 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitGlobalDefinition(clang::GlobalDecl, llvm::GlobalValue*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x41f16a3) #14 0x00000000041fd954 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitDeferred() (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x41fd954) #15 0x0000000004200277 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::Release() (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x4200277) #16 0x00000000046b6a49 (anonymous namespace)::CodeGeneratorImpl::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) ModuleBuilder.cpp:0:0 #17 0x00000000046b4cb6 clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x46b4cb6) #18 0x0000000006204d5c clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x6204d5c) #19 0x000000000496b278 clang::FrontendAction::Execute() (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x496b278) #20 0x00000000048dd074 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x48dd074) #21 0x0000000004a38092 clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x4a38092) #22 0x0000000000fd4e9c cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0xfd4e9c) #23 0x0000000000fcca73 ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&, llvm::ToolContext const&) driver.cpp:0:0 #24 0x0000000000fd140c clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0xfd140c) #25 0x0000000000ee2ef3 main (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0xee2ef3) #26 0x00007f8e4a10224c __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3524c) #27 0x0000000000fcaae9 _start /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.31/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120:0 clang: error: unable to execute command: Aborted ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Chandra Ghale <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.