Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add prefers-reduced-transparency variants #11692

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lukewarlow
Copy link
Contributor

Adds support for the prefers-reduced-transparency media query.

I've implemented and filed a Chrome Intent to Ship for this feature: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/EiZ2vlPy9xs

@lukewarlow
Copy link
Contributor Author

lukewarlow commented Jul 26, 2023

Draft while we wait for the 3 LGTM on the I2S. I'll comment here to let you know when I unflag the support.

@lukewarlow lukewarlow marked this pull request as draft July 26, 2023 15:30
@lukewarlow lukewarlow marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2023 19:29
@lukewarlow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Got the 3 approvals to ship so this media query will be coming to chrome 118

@RobinMalfait RobinMalfait changed the base branch from archive/master-2024-02-23 to next April 17, 2024 20:56
@RobinMalfait RobinMalfait changed the title Add prefers-reduced-transparency variants Add prefers-reduced-transparency variants Apr 17, 2024
@RobinMalfait
Copy link
Member

Hey!

You might have noticed that I forced pushed to this branch. The reason is because the PR now uses next as the base branch which is our working branch for Tailwind CSS v4. In other words, the feature you implemented here is now written in the new codebase.

The code is ported as-is, so no API changes of your feature happened while moving it to the new codebase.

I also made sure to add you as a co-author because you still deserve all the credit 💪

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants