Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Black format tests\test_trait_pipelines.py #84

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

eberrigan
Copy link
Collaborator

@eberrigan eberrigan commented Aug 26, 2024

  • tests\test_trait_pipelines.py needed black formatting.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Improved readability of assertions in the test functions for monocot pipelines, enhancing maintainability without affecting test functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to assertion statements in two test functions, test_younger_monocot_pipeline and test_older_monocot_pipeline, within the tests/test_trait_pipelines.py file. The adjustments focus on reformatting assertions for improved readability while maintaining the original logic and functionality of the tests.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/test_trait_pipelines.py Reformatted assertion statements in test_younger_monocot_pipeline and test_older_monocot_pipeline for clarity without altering logic.

Poem

In the land of code where bunnies play,
Assertions dance in a clearer way.
With every line, the logic stays tight,
Making tests shine, oh what a delight!
Hop along, dear friends, let’s cheer with glee,
For readability is the key! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.16%. Comparing base (afc4fa4) to head (739c7c9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #84   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.16%   76.16%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        1397     1397           
=======================================
  Hits         1064     1064           
  Misses        333      333           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between afc4fa4 and 739c7c9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_trait_pipelines.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/test_trait_pipelines.py

@eberrigan eberrigan merged commit 71442b3 into main Aug 26, 2024
5 checks passed
@eberrigan eberrigan deleted the elizabeth/lint branch August 26, 2024 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant