Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: Fix a couple of inconsistencies #3181

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

linusg
Copy link
Member

@linusg linusg commented Sep 21, 2023

Found while implementing these, details in commit messages.

@linusg linusg force-pushed the fix-inconsistencies branch 3 times, most recently from 1efbb5e to d658f31 Compare September 21, 2023 14:41
@linusg linusg changed the title Fix a couple of inconsistencies Editorial: Fix a couple of inconsistencies Sep 21, 2023
@linusg linusg force-pushed the fix-inconsistencies branch 2 times, most recently from 78d907e to 3e8b025 Compare September 21, 2023 14:44
spec.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@linusg
Copy link
Member Author

linusg commented Nov 7, 2023

Rebased on latest main - is there anything preventing this from being merged?

@michaelficarra
Copy link
Member

@linusg Waiting on review from another editor.

@bakkot
Copy link
Contributor

bakkot commented Dec 13, 2023

Backed out a couple changes the editors were less convinced of.

@linusg
Copy link
Member Author

linusg commented Dec 13, 2023

Fine by me, thanks for taking a look! Rebased and cleaned up the commit history a bit 👍

@michaelficarra michaelficarra removed the editor call to be discussed in the next editor call label Dec 14, 2023
@michaelficarra michaelficarra requested a review from a team December 14, 2023 00:31
@michaelficarra michaelficarra added the ready to merge Editors believe this PR needs no further reviews, and is ready to land. label Feb 21, 2024
…39#3181)

[[DateValue]] is known to be either a finite integral number or NaN, so the direct NaN check that all other methods already use is sufficient.
…c39#3181)

This name is already being used in functions with similar algorithms,
including splice(), toReversed(), toSpliced(), unshift(), and with().
tc39#3181)

The pattern of creating the property key only once when it is being used multiple times is already present in dozens of other functions.
…nc (tc39#3181)

These three basically implement the same algorithm, but had minor differences in structure and variable names.
@ljharb ljharb merged commit c579bc2 into tc39:main Feb 21, 2024
7 checks passed
@linusg linusg deleted the fix-inconsistencies branch February 21, 2024 23:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial change ready to merge Editors believe this PR needs no further reviews, and is ready to land.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants