Editorial: Fix parameter type of the OrdinaryCreateFromConstructor

[kimjg1119]

In OrdinaryCreateFromConstructor, the constructor parameter is currently expected to be a constructor.
However, the following code demonstrates that a function object can also be passed as the parameter(Specifically, the problem is from the EvaluateGeneratorBody).

function *f() {} f();
async function *f() {} f();

ESMeta log

Running ESMeta in dev branch reproduces the result below.

[ParamTypeMismatch] Call[13531] argument assignment to first parameter _constructor_ when Call[13508] function call from GeneratorBody[0,0].EvaluateGeneratorBody (step 2, 3:25-183) to OrdinaryCreateFromConstructor
- expected: Record[Constructor]
- actual  : Record[ECMAScriptFunctionObject]

[ParamTypeMismatch] Call[13809] argument assignment to first parameter _constructor_ when Call[13786] function call from AsyncGeneratorBody[0,0].EvaluateAsyncGeneratorBody (step 2, 3:33-231) to OrdinaryCreateFromConstructor
- expected: Record[Constructor]
- actual  : Record[ECMAScriptFunctionObject]

Since changing the type from a constructor to a function object does not introduce any breaks, I propose broadening the parameter type for now. This change would also align with GetPrototypeFromConstructor.

However, further discussion may needed because, given the current parameter names and descriptions, it is unclear whether these functions are intended to accept a function object rather than just a constructor.

[bakkot]

Thanks for filing. I'm closing as a duplicate of #3287; apologies for having left that open for so long.