Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TEP-0090: Refactor ResolvePipelineRunTask #4938

Merged

Conversation

jerop
Copy link
Member

@jerop jerop commented Jun 3, 2022

Changes

Prior to this commit, the logic for resolving a Task needed for a given PipelineTask was included within the ResolvePipelineRunTask function.

In this change, we separate that logic into its own function for reuse and readability.

No functional changes made in this commit.

/kind cleanup

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • [n/a] Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • [n/a] Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including functionality, content, code)
  • Release notes block below has been filled in (if there are no user facing changes, use release note "NONE")

Release Notes

NONE

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Jun 3, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 3, 2022
@jerop
Copy link
Member Author

jerop commented Jun 3, 2022

cc @abayer @lbernick @pritidesai

@jerop jerop force-pushed the tep-0090-refactor-resolvepipelineruntask branch from c83104c to 52ddcc1 Compare June 3, 2022 19:35
@jerop jerop changed the title Refactor ResolvePipelineRunTask TEP-0090: Refactor ResolvePipelineRunTask Jun 3, 2022
@jerop jerop force-pushed the tep-0090-refactor-resolvepipelineruntask branch from 52ddcc1 to 9402be9 Compare June 3, 2022 19:36
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/resources/pipelinerunresolution.go 91.9% 92.0% 0.1

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/resources/pipelinerunresolution.go 91.9% 92.0% 0.1

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/resources/pipelinerunresolution.go 91.9% 92.0% 0.1

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lbernick

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 3, 2022
Prior to this commit, the logic for resolving a `Task` needed for a
given `PipelineTask` was included within the `ResolvePipelineRunTask`
function.

In this change, we separate that logic into its own function for
reuse and readability. No functional changes made in this commit.
@jerop jerop force-pushed the tep-0090-refactor-resolvepipelineruntask branch from 9402be9 to cc480b0 Compare June 3, 2022 19:43
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/resources/pipelinerunresolution.go 91.9% 92.0% 0.1

@abayer
Copy link
Contributor

abayer commented Jun 3, 2022

/lgtm

Nice!

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 3, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 2c24e33 into tektoncd:main Jun 3, 2022
@@ -553,6 +526,41 @@ func ResolvePipelineRunTask(
return &rprt, nil
}

func resolveTask(ctx context.Context, taskRun *v1beta1.TaskRun, getTask resources.GetTask, task v1beta1.PipelineTask) (v1beta1.TaskSpec, string, v1beta1.TaskKind, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you @jerop for refactoring 🙏

not a blocker (its merged already 🤣) or the intent is not to demotivate but its always great to have a unit test for any new function introduced. We are carrying a lot of such functions without any unit tests since long time back.

@jerop jerop deleted the tep-0090-refactor-resolvepipelineruntask branch June 11, 2022 01:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants