Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: clarify that matmul, etc. are not summary ops #3681

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2020

Conversation

robertlugg
Copy link
Contributor

When I first read, it sounded as if matmult was a summary operator. adding 'just' and 'and', I feel, makes all the difference.

  • Motivation for features / changes
    I had to read a couple of times. Also difficult for ESL readers though perhaps grammatically correct.

  • Technical description of changes
    Clarify that matmult is NOT a summary op.

When I first read, it sounded as if matmult was a summary operator.  adding 'just' and 'and', I feel, makes all the difference.
Copy link
Contributor

@wchargin wchargin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@wchargin wchargin changed the title minor grammar change to reduce confusing docs: minor grammar change to reduce confusion May 29, 2020
@wchargin wchargin changed the title docs: minor grammar change to reduce confusion docs: clarify that matmul, etc. are not summary ops May 29, 2020
@wchargin wchargin merged commit 9142903 into tensorflow:master May 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants