This is a quick aggregation of snapshots of reliability assessments for media and other sources. Examples of sources that we'd like to include timestamped snapshots of (please add them or submit a PR)
NewsQ: 8+ collections of source evaluations along different dimensions (ca 2020). These include ABYZ News, the Eppys, Kinzen Community Curators, a Latinx media list, the Markkula Center for Journalism Ethics, NoBias, Vaccine Safety Network, Wikipedia
Media bias/fact check (MBFC)
- 3 assessments: Credibility, Factual reporting, Media bias : /somewhat contentious; not accepted on WP/
Iffy.news:
- MBFC assessments, for US outlets, just credibility& factual reporting ratings. Minus ~2% of outlets where the MBFC assessment is contentious.
- Misinfo.me
- List of pink-slime sites (fake local-news sites, astroturfed)
Predatory journals:
- Bealls + more - predatory & hijacked journals, predatory publishers
- composite list (via WP)
Wikipedia: Reliable Sources tables on wikipedia
- RS:P (global perennial sources) -- the english-language version is included as a NewsQ source. Many other languages exist.
- New Pages Patrol Source Guide (used by new page patrollers)
- topical Reliable Sources lists -- dozens in English alone.
Wikidata: there are few scattered source-reliablity assessments referenced on Wikidata. A recent discussion about how to add these programmatically led to the fledgling Credibility Ratings + Assessments Project.