-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 272
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deb/rpm packaging #129
Comments
This would be a good way for us to package our client / devel tools. It On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, adrelanos [email protected] wrote:
|
Maybe we could use PKGR, haven't really looked deeply into it: "The easiest way to get a debian package out of any app." |
Trishank Karthik Kuppusamy:
Any demo package link? I wanted to look, if the package looks acceptable. For example download https://deb.pkgr.io/pkgr/dillinger doesn't work for The services does not seem to be Free Software. I am wondering under Will packages created with this service be ready to be uploaded to |
Hey Patrick, thanks for checking to see whether PKGR makes sense! Probably On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Patrick Schleizer <[email protected]
|
stdeb claims to produce Debian packages from Python packages. |
See discussion in #263 for the current status of tuf in debian. Closing here. |
To spread the adaption of TUF, would deb/rpm packaging make sense? One package for maintainers, which includes signercli.py. Another package, which includes what applications could depend on.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: