Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update supported specification version to 1.0.28 #1825

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2022

Conversation

MVrachev
Copy link
Collaborator

@MVrachev MVrachev commented Feb 4, 2022

Fixes #1763

Description of the changes being introduced by the pull request:

I looked into all changes between our current version 1.0.19 and the
current version of the specification 1.0.28 and I agree with Jussi that
the only one not fully resolved is:
"8dafd00 (tag: v1.0.24) Clarify optional attributes" and more precisely
the changes from commit:
theupdateframework/specification@4dd279b

It doesn't make sense to have a target file without "paths" or
"path_hash_prefixes", so our python-tuf requirement to have at least
one of them set makes sense.

Both with Jussi we agreed that we can easily loosen this requirement if
when solving theupdateframework/specification#200
it's decided that both of them can be omitted, but for now,
we decided it's better to stick to our current requirement to have one of them set.

Signed-off-by: Martin Vrachev [email protected]

Please verify and check that the pull request fulfills the following
requirements
:

  • The code follows the Code Style Guidelines
  • Tests have been added for the bug fix or new feature
  • Docs have been added for the bug fix or new feature

I looked into all changes between our current version 1.0.19 and the
current version of the specification 1.0.28 and I agree with Jussi that
the only one not fully resolved is:
"8dafd00 (tag: v1.0.24) Clarify optional attributes" and more precisely
the changes from commit:
theupdateframework/specification@4dd279b

It doesn't make sense to have a target file without "paths" or
"path_hash_prefixes", so our `python-tuf requirement to have at least
one of them set makes sense.

Both with Jussi we agreed that we can easily loosen this requirement if
when solving theupdateframework/specification#200
it's decided that both of them can be omitted,
but for now, we decided it's better to stick to our current requirement
to have one of them set.

Signed-off-by: Martin Vrachev <[email protected]>
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1795233490

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.89%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1795054635: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1112
Relevant Lines: 1132

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@jku jku left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks correct to me.

@jku jku merged commit ba911e0 into theupdateframework:develop Feb 7, 2022
@MVrachev MVrachev deleted the specification-version branch February 8, 2022 11:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

specification has new version
3 participants