Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pairwise tip distances #57

Open
MichelleKendall opened this issue Oct 22, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Pairwise tip distances #57

MichelleKendall opened this issue Oct 22, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MichelleKendall
Copy link
Collaborator

Caroline pointed out that we could link "nNodes" and "patristic" with a parameter lambda, just like we do in our metric. Add this to Shiny app and make these methods more conveniently available from treescape function.

@MichelleKendall MichelleKendall self-assigned this Oct 22, 2015
@thibautjombart
Copy link
Owner

Yep that's true, that would be a new metric.

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Michelle Kendall [email protected]
wrote:

Caroline pointed out that we could link "nNodes" and "patristic" with a
parameter lambda, just like we do in our metric. Add this to Shiny app and
make these methods more conveniently available from treescape function.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#57.

@MichelleKendall
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes I think so - I will have to check the zero condition but I reckon the proof would hold by a very similar argument to the one we used for ours.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants